![Ski pant (at resort in The North Face Freedom pants)](/sites/default/files/images/articles/Ski%20pant%20%28at%20resort%20in%20The%20North%20Face%20Freedom%20pants%29.jpg)
![Ski pant (at resort in The North Face Freedom pants)](/sites/default/files/articles%20/Ski%20pant%20%28at%20resort%20in%20The%20North%20Face%20Freedom%20pants%20-%20m%29.jpg)
Switchback Travel (Jason Hummel)
Ski pants are a critical barrier between you and the elements, and there’s a pair to fit every type of skier and budget. Resort-goers typically opt for a classic hardshell design with some light insulation to stay warm on the lift rides up. Backcountry riders have plenty of softshell and stretch-infused options for improved range of motion and breathability. Of course, some of our recommended ski pants toe the line for those who like to do a little of both. Below are the best ski pants for the 2025 season. For more background information, see our comparison tables and buying advice below the picks, along with details about our testing process. Of note: This article includes options for both men and women, but we’ve also written dedicated round-ups on the best women’s ski pants and best men's ski pants.
Editor’s note: We updated this guide on February 19, 2025, to make it unisex, providing a more even split between men's and women's models. This involved revamping many of our product blurbs to reflect key differences between styles and adding several women's-specific designs to our top picks.
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No (thin flannel backer)
What we like: Fantastic build quality, weather protection, and versatility.
What we don’t: Expensive; fit intricacies with the last couple versions.
If we were to pick one ski pant for anywhere on the mountain, for conditions from bluebird to overcast and wet, it would be the Arc’teryx Sabre for men and Sentinel for women (below). These pants nearly have it all: 80-denier (D), 3-layer Gore-Tex for bomber protection from the elements, a lightweight flannel backer for comfort and a touch of warmth, and a solid feature set with plenty of storage. Attention to detail is also a Sabre hallmark, and the light-yet-burly construction is a nice break from the overly heavy and bulky feel that you get with most ski pants. As with most Arc’teryx gear, price is the biggest obstacle, and this is a significant investment if you don’t plan to get out a lot (one of the budget options below may be better for those who only ski occasionally).
The Sabre is an excellent choice for active resort skiers and those who like to venture beyond the ropes into the sidecountry. These pants won’t be out of place during trips in the backcountry either, with fantastic range of motion, along with big side vents for dumping heat. That said, Arc’teryx tweaked the fit a couple seasons ago, and we weren't fans: Both our testers at the time complained of a short rise and shorter-than-expected inseam. After checking out the most current 2024/25 version, we can report that the fit is still polarizing. The pants run small (so size up if you're on the fence), and the cut is very straight/athletic through the thighs and backside. Of note: Arc’teryx does now offer a Relaxed version with a roomier fit, along with a higher-riding bib design. Regardless of which option you choose, the Sabre is a truly high-quality and versatile offering from the venerable Canadian brand, earning it our top spot for yet another season.
Read more: men's Arc'teryx Sabre Pant review (prior version)
See the Men's Arc'teryx Sabre Pant
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No (thin flannel backer)
What we like: Class-leading fit, comfort, styling, and performance both in and out of bounds.
What we don’t: Arc'teryx quality comes at a steep cost—and not everyone needs this level of performance.
Arc'teryx's Sentinel is the women’s counterpart to the Sabre above and shares many of the same beloved features. Like the Sabre, the Sentinel is a great crossover option for those who split their time between the resort and backcountry. You get a durable, 3-layer Gore-Tex construction (also 80D) that provides dependable protection in wet and blustery weather and stands up well to frequent chairlift rides and tree skiing. The lightweight flannel backer offers a nice dose of coziness without being overwhelming on the skin track, while the generous side vents make it easy to dump excess heat. Finally, while the Sentinel shares the Sabre's athletic fit, we appreciate that it comes in three inseam lengths for more easily tailoring fit, along with an insulated model for those who run cold or ski in particularly frigid climates (plus the same relaxed and bib variations to round out the collection).
However, like most Arc’teryx gear, the Sentinel is undeniably spendy at $600. If you’re primarily a resort skier, you can save a lot by stepping down to a 2-layer design like Patagonia’s Insulated Powder Town Pants (which also come in a non-insulated version) or REI’s First Chair GTX Bibs below. You can expect to make sacrifices in breathability and comfort, but new or occasional riders will likely find the price savings worth those trade-offs. Alternatively, if you spend most of your time in the mountains, it may be worth considering Black Diamond’s Recon Stretch below, which will save you $200 but falls short in protection and overall refinement. In the end, it’s hard to knock Arc’teryx’s level of quality—it certainly comes at a price, but there’s no denying the Sentinel’s top-notch craftsmanship and all-around performance.
See the Women's Arc'teryx Sentinel Pant
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell w/ stretch
Insulated: Yes (60g PrimaLoft)
What we like: Just-right warmth, stretchy and comfortable fit, and great price.
What we don’t: Material is prone to showing wear over time.
Dedicated resort riders—especially those who live in cold climates like the Northeast or Midwest of the U.S.—might find insulated ski pants appealing. Though they lack the versatility of uninsulated designs (you can't tailor warmth depending on conditions), insulated pants will undoubtedly keep you comfortable on cold chairlift rides, in long lift lines, and when skiing downhill on frigid days. For a super clean insulated pant with a great fit and just-right warmth, give the Legendary from Helly Hansen a look. The 2-layer waterproof shell is ideal for those who aren’t frequently working up a sweat—and helps keep costs in check—and the PrimaLoft insulation provides excellent warmth on bitter days. We also like the lightweight feel and simple design from the Norwegian company, which comes in a variety of classy colorways to match just about any ski jacket.
In terms of mobility, the Legendary incorporates mechanical stretch into the fabric that offers extra "give," which is great for both sidecountry hikes and downhill travel. The fit also hits a great middle ground for many riders: It’s not overly bulky like many options in its price range, but there’s still plenty of room for most folks to layer underneath. Our main issue is with the durability of the fabric: The relatively thin materials and price-conscious build aren’t quite up to par with Arc’teryx’s Sabre above or Patagonia’s Storm Shift below, and the pants will show more wear over time. But the Legendary costs far less than those alternatives, and its blend of comfort, price, and performance has earned it a spot high on our list for multiple years running.
See the Men's HH Legendary Insulated Pants
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: Yes (60g Thermogreen)
What we like: Cozy and reliably weatherproof without breaking the bank.
What we don’t: Insulated pants aren't for everyone; we don't love the Velcro waist adjustments.
Patagonia is a consistent leader in the ski apparel market, and their Insulated Powder Town Pants were quick to win over our female tester. Protection is the first thing that stood out to us: The pants are very reliable thanks to a quality H2No membrane and nice assortment of weather-ready features, including built-in gaiters, water-resistant zippers, and powder skirt compatibility. Additionally, the 60-gram (g) Thermogreen insulation is enough to take the edge off while keeping bulk to a minimum, and the soft taffeta lining and accommodating fit translate to great all-day comfort and mobility. Finally, we appreciate that the pants are built with Patagonia’s typical eye toward sustainability and come in a whopping seven sizes and two inseam lengths.
As we mentioned above, insulated ski pants have some inherent limitations. Most of the time, we prefer opting for a non-insulated pant and tweaking our layers underneath depending on the conditions. The Powder Town does come with outer thigh vents, which we found to be surprisingly effective at dumping excess heat, but the pants are lacking in breathability for anything more than the occasional sidecountry jaunt (even the non-insulated version runs warm due to its 2L construction). We also found the Velcro waist adjustments prone to snagging on baselayers and scratching against bare skin. But for skiers who are sold on insulated pants, the Powder Town puts it all together better than most—in a pretty affordable package to boot.
Read more: women's Patagonia Insulated Powder Town review
See the Women's Insulated Powder Town Pants
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: Yes (40g polyester)
What we like: Strong value for a well-rounded resort design.
What we don’t: Underbuilt for particularly wet conditions.
REI’s in-house outerwear continually impresses us when it comes to bang for your buck, and their Powderbound Insulated Pants are no exception. Overall, we think they’ve put together a solid resort companion: The 2-layer Peak waterproof membrane holds up well in most winter weather, and the moderate dose of insulation (40g) adds a nice barrier on cold chairlift rides. Tack on a thoughtful set of ski-specific features—including internal gaiters, tough scuff guards, Velcro waist adjustments, and tricot-lined hand pockets—and the Powderbound stands out as a complete and very well-built option for the price.
Like most ski pants in this price range, the Powderbound is only critically seam-sealed, which helps keep costs low but results in less assurance when skiing in sustained, heavy snow (or even worse—rain). If you’re an avid resort rider who often finds themselves skiing in wet conditions, we recommend spending up for a more trustworthy 3-layer design. The pockets and vents also feature fabric flaps rather than water-resistant zippers, resulting in added bulk. But for casual skiers who get out in mostly fair weather, the Powderbound is largely uncompromised and a truly solid value at just $159. For those who prefer the added coverage of a bib, REI also makes the Powderbound Insulated Bib for $219.
See the Men's Powderbound Insulated Pants
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
Insulated: (60g PrimaLoft)
What we like: A value standout; reliable weatherproofing and great mobility.
What we don’t: Falls short of the Patagonia Powder Town above in a few ways.
The men’s Legendary Insulated Pants above won us over for their cozy warmth at a great price, and it’s a similar story with the women’s model here. Like the men’s version, the women’s Legendary features a thick, 2-layer construction that utilizes their Helly Tech Performance waterproofing, which we found to be pretty reliable in testing. It also boasts the same 60g PrimaLoft synthetic insulation for taking the sting out of frigid weather, along with mechanical stretch for maximizing mobility—whether you’re bootpacking into the sidecountry or bending over to adjust your ski boots. And we’d be remiss not to mention the $200 price tag, which handily undercuts most options here.
Why did Patagonia’s Powder Town Insulated Pants score a higher spot on our list? Despite costing $69 more than the Legendary, the Powder Town uses higher-quality materials—we especially like the soft taffeta lining—and boasts a much stronger sustainability slant, including a fully PFAS-free construction (only the Legendary’s DWR coating is free of these harmful “forever chemicals”). The Patagonia pants also come in two inseam lengths compared to just one for the Helly Hansen. Comparisons aside, the Legendary is a very well-rounded performer for the price and better built than most true “budget” designs. A final bonus: The Legendary Pants (both men’s and women’s styles) are eligible for Helly Hansen’s Ski Free program, which allows you to redeem a ski pass at any of the participating resorts (there are currently 24 within the U.S. to choose from and around double that worldwide).
See the Women's Legendary Insulated Pants
Best for: Backcountry
Type: Hardshell w/ stretch
Insulated: No
What we like: Thin and stretchy 3-layer fabric balances comfort, breathability, and waterproofing.
What we don’t: Expensive and slim-fitting; nitpicks with some features.
Not only does backcountry skiing require a distinct skill set from resort skiing, it’s also best done with a completely different set of gear. Balancing uphill and downhill performance, backcountry ski pants generally feature a slim fit (read: less fabric getting in the way climbing the skin track); thin, breathable, and stretchy materials; and features like large vents and a beacon-compatible pocket. The newly redesigned Patagonia Stormstride is one of the most purpose-built pants out there, getting the job done with a stretchy 40D nylon shell and reliable 3-layer H2No Performance Standard waterproofing.
We love the sleek and streamlined look and feel of the Stormstride, which checks in significantly lighter than most alternatives here. And after over a season of rigorous backcountry use, our pair has shown impressively few signs of wear or deterioration. However, Patagonia hasn’t landed on the perfect design: Notably, the slim fit is restrictive in areas, and some features are simply too pared-down, including the small pockets and non-glove-friendly zipper pulls. And the thin shell fabric is no match for a burlier resort pant (for comparison's sake, Patagonia's own Storm Shift below uses 150D nylon)—it'll get the job done in light to moderate moisture but will become overwhelmed in stormy conditions. But the Stormstride nevertheless nails the backcountry pant archetype better than most with a great mix of comfort, mobility, breathability, and waterproofing.
Read more: men's Patagonia Stormstride Pants review (prior version)
See the Men's Patagonia Stormstride Pants
Best for: Backcountry
Type: Hardshell w/ stretch
Insulated: No
What we like: Checks most of the boxes for committed backcountry riders for less than the Stormstride above.
What we don’t: Falls short of the premium Arc'teryx Sentinel above in terms of materials and fit; less impervious than non-stretchy hardshells.
Black Diamond’s Recon Stretch is a well-rounded design for days that take you deep into the mountains. As its name implies, this 3-layer hardshell pant is stretch-infused to provide softshell-like mobility for easy transitions and hoofing it up the skin track. All the requisite features are there, too, including three deep pockets, outer thigh vents for regulating temperature, and even a removable belt for dialing in fit (most pants use cheaper Velcro tabs that can cause irritation underneath pack straps). Rounding out the design, you get Black Diamond’s in-house BD.dry membrane that we’ve found to be largely effective in wet and windy weather and a competitively low weight of just over a pound.
Though a considerable $200 cheaper than the Arc’teryx Sentinel above, the Recon Stretch is certainly less premium. For one, we prefer the Sentinel’s fit, which is more flattering and athletic. In testing, we also found the Sentinel fared better in rough and rowdy weather, which is due to the Arc’teryx’s upgraded Gore-Tex construction and the lack of stretch in the fabric (stretchy materials are more porous, therefore more permeable to moisture). To be fair, the Recon is no slouch and will get the job done in most conditions, and there’s no doubt that it’s a better value at $400. If you’re willing to sacrifice a bit of protection in the name of mobility and cost savings, the Recon Stretch is a great option to have on your radar.
See the Women's BD Recon Stretch Pants
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No
What we like: Bomber protection in wet and deep snow.
What we don’t: Burly build is overkill for mild conditions and high-output use.
For maximum protection when skiing in wet snow and deep powder, it’s hard to beat a ski bib. And among the many options on the market, Flylow Gear’s Baker is a standout. It has a long track record of waterproof performance from its 3-layer build and DWR coating, is super tough with panels of reinforced Cordura, and has an easily adjustable fit with Velcro tabs on the sides. The Baker also performs well for sidecountry hikes and backcountry tours with a ventilation system that features both massive side vents and zippered openings along the inner thigh.
What do you give up with the Baker’s bib design? The extra waterproof layer around the stomach and lower back makes it run hotter and heavier than a comparable pant, and it’s overkill on mild-weather days. Additionally, the Flylow’s substantial construction and moderately baggy fit can inhibit range of motion for skinning uphill. But the Baker is a perfect match for its namesake mountain: It's built to handle anything from wet, unruly conditions to bottomless powder days. Interestingly, Flylow doesn’t offer an equivalent female version, although their women’s Foxy Bib (featured below) is a favorite of ours and boasts similar coverage, organization, and build quality. The key difference is its Tactic construction, which is stretchier, lighter, and thinner than the Baker’s Surface build (both are 3L designs).
See the Men's Flylow Gear Baker Bib
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No
What we like: Stylish with high-quality materials and features, reliable weatherproofing, and a handy drop seat.
What we don’t: Too thick and heavy for dedicated backcountry use (though it’s fine for short tours).
Along with obvious advantages in coverage and protection, there’s no denying the style points you get with opting for a ski bib over pants. Trew Gear’s women’s-specific Chariot Bib Primo is one of the most flattering options out there, combining a high-quality construction with an attractive freeride aesthetic that’s sure to stand out. Beyond the classy styling, the Chariot checks many important performance boxes: Trew Gear’s in-house PNW Primo membrane is reminiscent of Gore-Tex in both look and feel, and you get full seam taping and water-resistant zippers for added assurance when the skies open up. We also came away pleased by the Chariot’s generous storage layout and half-moon drop seat. Taken together, it’s an excellent quiver-of-one option for resort-goers who embark on the occasional tour.
No design is perfect, however, and the Chariot Bib Primo did fall short in a few areas during our testing. First and foremost, the bib is on the heavy end at nearly 2 pounds, making it best suited for lift-accessed terrain and short tours when weight isn’t a huge consideration. Additionally, the thick fabrics and high-riding upper result in subpar breathability, and the relaxed fit isn’t our favorite for mobility-dependent activities (in these cases, we much prefer a trim-fitting design that more closely mirrors our movements). A final nitpick is that the vertical chest pockets aren’t the most secure, so they wouldn’t be our first choice for stashing valuables. But overall, we think Trew put together a pretty well-rounded design in the Chariot Bib Primo, especially when it comes to protection, styling, and overall build quality.
Read more: Trew Gear Chariot Bib Primo review
See the Women's Trew Gear Chariot Bib Primo
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No (available)
What we like: Good looks, durable materials, and impressive sustainability measures.
What we don’t: Fit is a little big; expensive for a 2-layer design.
The Storm Shift is one of Patagonia’s premium resort pants and a big step up from most of the 2-layer offerings here. First, you get solid weatherproofing by way of a Gore-Tex membrane and a robust 150D shell fabric with a DWR finish. Vents on the outside of the thigh effectively dump heat (we’ve found outer thigh vents to be better performing than those on the inner thigh), and a brushed tricot liner adds a high-end feel that slides on nicely over baselayer bottoms. Fit-wise, the Storm Shift falls slightly on the big and baggy end, and it’s only offered in a single 32-inch inseam length, but the articulated cut and waist adjustments should keep many skiers happy.
Like a lot of Patagonia gear, the Storm Shift is rather pricey at $399. It’s also not a backcountry-specific piece with its heavy 2-layer build and hanging mesh/polyester lining (although the vents along the outer leg do a decent job at dumping heat). But it’s hard to beat the design’s sustainability chops: The Gore-Tex construction is completely PFAS-free (including the membrane, DWR finish, and fabric), recycled materials are used throughout, and it’s Fair Trade Certified sewn. And comparing the men’s and women’s versions, we appreciate that Patagonia kept things mostly consistent between the two: The women’s model has a slightly more tailored cut and is available in different colorway options, but otherwise, you can expect very similar (read: excellent) overall performance.
Read more: men's Patagonia Storm Shift Pants review
See the Men's Patagonia Storm Shift See the Women's Patagonia Storm Shift
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No (available)
What we like: Proven and tough resort design; available in a good range of sizes and colors.
What we don’t: Baggy fit isn’t for everyone; design decisions aren't as considered.
For weekend warriors and those who don’t want to spend a ton on ski gear, no pants are more popular at the resort than The North Face Freedom. It’s a classic choice featuring a thick 2-layer construction that is super durable and blocks out wind and snow effectively. The venting system is surprisingly good for a cheaper pant, and Velcro adjusters at the sides of the waist are a simple but effective tool for dialing in fit. Another plus is that the pants are offered in a decently wide range of sizes (from XXS to XXL) and three different inseam lengths. To be clear, the Freedom is a noticeable step down in quality from our top picks, but it covers the basics for resort skiers at a great price.
Keep in mind that although the Freedom pants will do the trick for skiing laps and long chairlift rides, performance-minded skiers likely will be left wanting more. To start, the fit is pretty generic—there isn’t any stretch built into the fabric, and they’re quite baggy around the thighs and lower legs. Moreover, it’s fairly easy to overheat with the cheap waterproofing technology, and while we like the zippered vents, their placement along the inner thigh creates extra bulk. All that said, this is a great choice for the casual user, and we appreciate that The North Face lowered the price fairly recently to be closer to what it once was. Of note: For those who prefer insulated pants, there’s the Freedom Insulated that’ll run you $200. On the women's side, TNF only offers an insulated or a newer stretch version, both of which retail for $200.
Read more: men's The North Face Freedom Insulated Pants review
See the Men's The North Face Freedom Pants
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
Insulated: No
What we like: Stylish and utilitarian; a better backcountry companion than the Chariot Bib Primo above.
What we don’t: Not as weatherproof as the Chariot Bib; we'd prefer a traditional drop seat over the Foxy's "barn door" opening.
Flylow touts the Foxy Bib as both stylish and utilitarian, and we think that description sums up the design well. Like the Trew Chariot above, the Foxy is a versatile bib that can handle the rigors of both inbounds use and missions into the backcountry. In fact, the Foxy gets the edge over the Chariot for touring due to its lower weight (by around 10 oz.) and stretch-infused fabric that provides a nice dose of added mobility (Flylow lists the Foxy as a softshell bib, but the 3L construction offers protection on par with most hardshells). Final highlights include both inner and outer thigh vents that allow for great airflow, a six-pocket layout that makes it easy to divvy up a day’s worth of essentials, and availability in numeric sizing and three inseam lengths for a highly customizable fit.
Why do we rank the Chariot above the Foxy? For one, the Foxy’s stretch-infused fabric compromises a little on all-out protection compared to the Chariot’s more rigid construction. We also prefer the Chariot’s traditional drop seat over the Foxy’s less intuitive “barn door” opening, and we wish Flylow had included a clip for securing an avalanche beacon (a questionable omission given the Foxy’s backcountry intentions). Finally, it’s worth noting that the Foxy has a relatively trim fit, which limits mobility and storage capacity—those who spend a lot of time on the skin track will likely want to size up. Still, there’s no denying the Foxy’s great overall performance and stylish appearance, earning it a spot on our list this season.
Read more: Flylow Gear Foxy Bib review
See the Women's Flylow Gear Foxy Bib
Best for: Backcountry and resort
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No (thin flannel backer)
What we like: Great-fitting and high-quality technical pants that excel in the resort and backcountry.
What we don’t: A bit stiffer, crinklier, and heavier than the Sabre above.
To those who haven’t been introduced, Norway-based Norrøna is a relative newcomer to the U.S. market but has been a strong player for years in Europe. Their gear exudes thoughtful design, quality, and Scandinavian style—it often reminds us of Arc’teryx but with a distinct look and often overbuilt feel (in a good way). The versatile Lofoten Gore-Tex is a core item for the company, and after a season of testing, we came away extremely impressed. The 3-layer Gore-Tex build provides bomber protection, we love the athletic fit for active use, and comfort is notable with a soft Gore C-Knit liner. The details are well sorted, too, with water-resistant zippers and easy-to-grab zipper pulls, along with an optional zip-in bib (a fun add-on that’s sold separately for $69). Additionally, for the 2024/25 season, the pants use the new PFAS-free Gore-Tex ePE fabric.
How does the Lofoten Gore-Tex stack up to our top-rated Sabre (and women’s Sentinel)? Both are fantastic technical designs with reliable Gore-Tex constructions, soft and comfortable interiors, and quality touch points throughout. Differences are relatively minor: The Lofoten is a little burlier, and we like the security of its features, including the overbuilt waist adjuster and solid buttons. On the other hand, the Arc’teryx is a little less stiff and crinkly—a plus while hiking and skinning—and can dump heat faster since there's no mesh backing on the vents (on the other hand, the Norrøna’s are more protective against blowing snow). A final nitpick with the Norrøna is that we don’t love the placement of its thigh pockets, which are set right along the front of the leg and can lead to small items ending up in the corner next to your knee (note: The women’s version only has one thigh pocket, although it’s similarly problematic). But for a premium design for the 50/50 crowd who dip in and out of the ropes, the Lofoten is well worth a look.
See the Men's Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex See the Women's Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No
What we like: A bomber pant that does just about everything well.
What we don’t: Fit is still a little baggy for our tastes; not the most well-rounded crossover choice.
Flylow Gear flies a little under the radar compared to some of the bigger outdoor brands, but their men's-specific Chemical Pant (and women's Donna below) is a solid offering. Like Flylow's own Baker Bib above, the Chemical is a super tough design with a 3-layer build, Cordura patches in high-wear areas like the knees and cuffs, and waterproof zippers. Given the impressive level of protection, the pants ventilate well, and you can release hot air in four places: two zippered vents along the inner thighs and two large vents along the outside of your legs. Tack on availability in six sizes, three inseam lengths, and a nice assortment of colorways, and it's easy to see why the Chemical Pant has garnered a loyal following over the years.
The Chemical (and matching women’s Donna below) is the most affordable 3-layer pant here. However, like many other crossover options on our list, the Chemical is a bit heavy for backcountry use and has a relatively baggy fit that can get in the way when skinning. On the bright side, you do get handy features like inner and outer thigh vents and a clip for securing a beacon, making the Chemical a nice choice for those who primarily ski inbounds but like to earn their turns on occasion (Flylow puts the split at 80/20, which we think is a good estimate). But all things considered, the Chemical Pant is a solid deal and a notable step up in performance from most 2-layer alternatives.
See the Men's Flylow Gear Chemical Pant
Best for: Resort and backcountry
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No
What we like: Competitively priced for the level of performance.
What we don’t: There are some obvious signs of cost-cutting.
Much like its men's counterpart, the Chemical Pant above, Flylow’s women's-specific Donna boasts a protective and burly 3-layer design in an affordable $365 package. However, the two do have some noteworthy differences worth highlighting: First, while the Donna has a pretty laid-back vibe, it’s less baggy than the Chemical, which translates to improved mobility. The Donna also omits Cordura knee patches and boasts thinner (500D vs. 1,000D) cuff reinforcements, although it’s still highly durable and well suited for regular use and abuse. The pocket layout is different, too, including two hand pockets and one on the thigh (which we personally prefer over a back pocket). Finally, the Donna is offered in numeric rather than alpha sizing but only features one inseam length compared to the Chemical’s three—a bummer for those with especially tall or short builds.
The Donna Pant uses a stretchy hardshell fabric (shared with Flylow’s Foxy Bib above) that allows for better freedom of movement compared to the men's Chemical, and we appreciate that Flylow retained the effective venting system that comprises both inner and outer thigh vents. However, like the Foxy, the Donna wouldn’t be our first choice in particularly rough and rowdy conditions—for that, we turn to more premium Gore-Tex. And we’re a bit confused by the faux back pockets, which lend some style points but add unnecessary bulk and may lead to discomfort when sitting down. But overall, the Donna is a sleek and stylish design at a great price point, and we appreciate that Flylow recently updated all their women’s bottoms to numeric sizing for more easily fine-tuning fit.
See the Women's Flylow Gear Donna Pant
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell
Insulated: No
What we like: Well priced for what you get, including solid wet-weather protection, great all-day comfort, and effective ventilation.
What we don’t: Makes some notable sacrifices in wind resistance and fit.
Like REI's own Powderbound Pants above, their First Chair GTX Bibs strike a nice balance between price and performance. This 2-layer design is outfitted with premium Gore-Tex, a PFAS-free DWR coating, and full seam taping for reliable protection in the wet. Comfort is another selling point: The design is relatively stretchy and easy to move in due to the generous amount of spandex (29%), supple knit panel at the back, and soft tricot lining along the upper legs, and the wide shoulder straps go largely unnoticed throughout the day. Finally, while decidedly resort-focused, the First Chair’s thigh vents are generously sized and great at promoting airflow on warm days or when accessing hike-to terrain.
As with all budget designs, the REI First Chair GTX Bibs make some concessions in the name of savings. First, the 2-layer construction isn’t the most breathable design. To be fair, we found it more than adequate for resort use, even when venturing into hike-to terrain beyond the ropes, and the outer thigh vents mentioned above do a good job dumping excess heat (they also double as drop-tail adjustments for bathroom breaks). Another complaint is that the fabric isn’t particularly wind resistant—we were able to feel chilly drafts through the shell on blustery days and when skiing downhill. And in terms of refinement, the First Chair isn’t a standout: Our male tester experienced noticeable binding when hiking and skiing due to a snug fit around the hips, and the shoulder strap buckles are prone to loosening throughout the day. But it’s hard to be overly critical at this price point, and new and occasional riders will undoubtedly find a lot to like.
Read more: men's REI First Chair GTX Bibs review
See the Men's REI First Chair GTX Bibs See the Women's REI First Chair GTX Bibs
Pant |
Price | Best for | Type | Insulated | Fabric | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arc'teryx Sabre Pant | $600 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell | No (flannel) | 3-layer | 1 lb. 5.0 oz. |
Helly Hansen Legendary | $200 | Resort | Hardshell w/stretch | Yes | 2-layer | 1 lb. 4.1 oz. |
REI Powderbound | $159 | Resort | Hardshell | Yes | 2-layer | 1 lb. 9.4 oz. |
Patagonia Stormstride | $449 | Backcountry | Hardshell w/stretch | No | 3-layer | 1 lb. 4.1 oz. |
Flylow Gear Baker Bib | $430 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell | No | 3-layer | 2 lb. 1.6 oz. |
Patagonia Storm Shift | $399 | Resort | Hardshell | No | 2-layer | 1 lb. 10.2 oz. |
The North Face Freedom | $170 | Resort | Hardshell | No (avail.) | 2-layer | 1 lb. 3.7 oz. |
Norrøna Lofoten | $579 | Backcountry/resort | Hardshell | No (flannel) | 3-layer | 1 lb. 9.3 oz. |
Flylow Chemical Pant | $365 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell | No | 3-layer | 1 lb. 11.2 oz. |
REI First Chair GTX Bibs | $269 | Resort | Hardshell w/stretch | No | 2-layer | 1 lb. 12.9 oz. |
Pant |
Price | Best for | Type | Insulated | Fabric | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arc'teryx Sentinel | $600 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell | No (flannel) | 3-layer | 1 lb. 2.0 oz. |
Patagonia Powder Town | $269 | Resort | Hardshell | Yes | 2-layer | 1 lb. 6.3 oz. |
Helly Hansen Legendary | $200 | Resort | Hardshell w/stretch | Yes | 2-layer | 1 lb. 1.6 oz. |
BD Recon Stretch | $400 | Backcountry | Hardshell w/stretch | No | 3-layer | 1 lb. 0.9 oz. |
Trew Gear Chariot Bib | $519 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell | No | 3-layer | 1 lb. 15.5 oz. |
Patagonia Storm Shift | $399 | Resort | Hardshell | No | 2-layer | 1 lb. 8.3 oz. |
Flylow Gear Foxy Bib | $430 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell w/stretch | No | 3-layer | 1 lb. 5.6 oz. |
Norrøna Lofoten | $579 | Backcountry/resort | Hardshell | No (flannel) | 3-layer | 1 lb. 6.0 oz. |
Flylow Donna Pant | $365 | Resort/backcountry | Hardshell | No | 3-layer | 1 lb. 6.4 oz. |
REI First Chair GTX Bibs | $269 | Resort | Hardshell w/stretch | No | 2-layer | 1 lb. 9.4 oz. |
As snow begins to fall and you're gearing up to hit the slopes, you'll obviously want the right skis or snowboard, but having the proper apparel is also crucial for your overall comfort and enjoyment. The Switchback Travel crew has been testing ski pants since 2015 when former editor-in-chief and lifelong skier John Ellings first established this guide with seven high-quality designs. Some of those classics remain on our list to this day, including staples like The North Face Freedom and Flylow Chemical Pant. John also enlisted the help of longtime contributors and avid backcountry skiers Brian McCurdy and Sasha Brown, who are based in Canada and very familiar with wet, challenging conditions. Editor Maddie Downie now manages our ski pant coverage, drawing from years of resort skiing in Colorado and touring in Washington's rugged North Cascades.
Our current lineup of 17 ski pants reflects years of hands-on testing and feedback from our extensive freelancer network, trusted friends, and the online ski community. When we test ski pants and bibs, we evaluate performance by looking closely at metrics like protection and breathability, taking each pant into variable weather to see how it holds up in inclement conditions and venturing outside the ropes to gauge how well it dumps excess heat. We also pay attention to how each pant fares over the long term, noting any snags, tears, or broken components. We know that every skier is different, so we make an effort to ensure our list is well rounded with options for both resort and backcountry use that range in price from budget to premium. Since the market is ever-evolving, we revisit the guide frequently to ensure that it stays up-to-date with current offerings that score high marks in our testing. Of note: We've also put together dedicated lists of the best men's ski pants and best women's ski pants, which feature picks tailored for each gender.
Ski pants are designed for use at the resort, deep in the backcountry, or a mix of the two, so we’ve included a “best for” specification in our product descriptions and table above. Starting with inbounds skiing, these pants are built tough—you typically get strong face fabrics, fully waterproof and windproof constructions, and generous fits for layering. If you consistently ski in frigid temperatures, it may be worth considering an insulated design, although we sometimes prefer the flexibility of a thick, non-insulated shell for season-long use.
Traveling uphill while breaking trail or on the skin track has an impact on your pant needs. First off, mobility and freedom of movement are very important for backcountry use, so you’ll often find some form of stretch built into the fabric and an athletic fit. Additionally, breathability is essential—the materials on pants optimized for the backcountry are thinner and you get large zippered side vents for staying cool. Finally, all-out weather protection can sometimes be compromised in the quest to keep you from overheating (whether or not this is a good idea for you will depend on your local weather and snow conditions). For those looking for a single pant for mixed use, we still recommend a substantial waterproof design, such as the Arc'teryx Sabre and women's Sentinel, Trew Gear Chariot Bib Primo, or Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex.
In general, modern ski pants are built with one of three types of shell fabric: hardshell, hardshell with mechanical stretch, or softshell. The type of fabric you opt for will depend on where you're skiing (we favor hardshells for resort use) and how much mobility you need (stretchy designs are great for mogul skiers and uphill enthusiasts). The vast majority of skiers will opt for a pant that uses hardshell or hardshell with integrated stretch, but we also briefly cover softshell pants below.
Hardshell
For most resort days, it’s hard to beat a traditional hardshell pant. Hardshells provide a reliable barrier against wet snow and harsh winds (great for long chairlift rides), and pricier options can have impressively long lifespans. Due to their burly constructions, hardshells aren't particularly breathable, and you'll have to put up with their more rigid feel. But resort skiers generally don’t need an especially breathable or supple pant, and the good news is that most hardshells here have side vents to dump heat on warmer days. The Flylow Chemical Pant is a standout example, with bombproof 3-layer protection, a substantial 150D face fabric, and generous vents on both the inside and the outside of the legs.
Hardshell with Stretch
Hard-charging resort skiers, sidecountry enthusiasts, and most backcountry skiers will want a waterproof pant, but a little extra stretch is an appreciated feature. Designs like the Patagonia Stormstride and Black Diamond Recon Stretch feature a hardshell construction with built-in stretch, which is a lot more supple than a standard hardshell—you don’t get that rigid and crinkly feel—and places a premium on freedom of movement and breathability. However, you do compromise a bit in the way of all-out protection: Stretchy fabrics allow more air to flow than a hardshell, so they feel less impervious in strong gusts. Additionally, they’re more prone to wetting out after extended exposure. But it doesn’t get much better for most backcountry skiers, and it’s for good reason that we see more stretch-infused hardshell pants hitting the market each year.
Softshell
On the far end of the spectrum are pants that feature softshell construction, such as the Outdoor Research Trailbreaker Tour (not featured on this list), which has softshell fabric above the knees. This material is stretchy, air-permeable, and soft against the skin, which makes it great for high-output pursuits. On the flip side, softshells absorb moisture much more readily than hardshells, and many options lack a waterproof membrane. As a result, a softshell pant is a bad pairing in wet weather—even sitting on snow for an extended period can be a problem—so we don't recommend them for particularly soggy days or resort use.
In terms of warmth, ski pants fall into two basic categories: models with built-in synthetic fill and uninsulated shells. Resort skiers, and especially those that stick to groomed runs, will be best off with an insulated model. The boost in warmth is useful to fend off the chill, and the thicker construction provides an additional barrier between you and a frigid chairlift seat (or when sitting on snow). As mentioned above, the vast majority of insulated ski pants use synthetic fill due to its affordability and that it continues to insulate even when wet (unlike goose or duck down). The amount of warmth offered doesn’t vary too widely, and most use somewhere between 40g and 80g fill. The ideal amount for you will depend on your local conditions, skiing style (aggressive or casual), and if you’re prone to running hot or cold. Opting for a pant with 60g synthetic is a safe bet, and a design like the Helly Hansen Legendary is often the sweet spot for many skiers.
That being said, an uninsulated pant makes a lot of sense for hard chargers or those who plan to ski the side- and backcountry. A shell pant won’t be as prone to overheating if you’re a mogul rider, spend a lot of time off-trail in soft snow, or if you do any extended hiking. And if you’ll be ski touring, a shell pant is a must-have to stay as cool as possible. A final benefit of foregoing insulation is that you can tune your baselayer depending on conditions: For springtime or active use, you can opt for a lightweight model, and mid or heavyweight baselayers are great in the cold. Again, those planning on lapping the resort will most likely prefer the extra isolation and comfort of an insulated design, but there are a number of situations where a shell is the preferred option.
Most premium ski pants have a 3-layer construction, which incorporates three separate pieces of fabric: an outer shell, the actual waterproof and breathable membrane, and an inner lining. This makes it less bulky compared to a 2-layer design (these require a separate, hanging mesh liner along the interior) and also improves breathability and next-to-skin comfort. 3-layer pants are more expensive than 2-layer models and often involve big names like Gore-Tex and AscentShell. As a result of their strengths, 3-layer pants are popular among serious downhill and backcountry skiers.
Many mid-range and budget ski pants have a 2-layer construction. These are less breathable than 3-layer designs, although the simple designs often use thick fabrics that are quite durable. We’ve found that 2-layer pants are perfectly suitable for resort use where ventilation and mobility aren't as important (those skiing moguls or prone to overheating are exceptions). You can save quite a bit of cash by going this route, as some 2-layer ski pants run around $100-$150 (the North Face Freedom Pant costs $170, for example). For comparison, the cheapest 3-layer waterproof pants on our list are Flylow's Donna and Chemical Pant at $365.
Quality water resistance in a ski pant is an absolute must. They come in contact with snow on nearly every run and really put the membrane and outer fabric to the test. For ultimate waterproof protection, look for a burly hardshell pant made with Gore-Tex, eVent, or NeoShell. Mid-range and entry-level options utilize the manufacturer’s in-house laminates that are still fully waterproof but most likely won’t have as long a lifespan. Seam taping and a DWR coating also are important for hard chargers to keep moisture from sneaking through. In terms of waterproofing, spending a little more does get you a nice upgrade in quality and longevity.
Backcountry skiers have a different set of priorities, so they do not always require full waterproofing. Less time sitting on a chair and more time on the skin track means that some backcountry skiers only need waterproofing in specific areas or a very water-resistant construction (especially for riders in regions known for dry snow like the Rocky Mountains). Your needs will vary but don't automatically discount a partially waterproof or non-waterproof pant for backcountry use.
As we touched on above, breathability needs are closely aligned with your intended use(s). Resort riders, and especially those who plan to stay on groomed runs, don’t require a light and airy design. Most standard 2-layer constructions will offer sufficient breathability, and you can always select one with zippered vents to dump a little excess heat as needed. If you venture into the sidecountry, however, plan to mix in some touring days, or are a backcountry enthusiast, breathability then becomes an important consideration. Among waterproof builds, lightweight 3-layer constructions are the best ventilators (including the Patagonia Stormstride and Black Diamond Recon Stretch), and many softshell-inspired designs are even more impressive. You make compromises in all-out protection in harsh wind and wet snow, but air-permeable options like the Recon Stretch and Arc'teryx Sabre are great performers when working hard.
Ski pants see a lot of rough use—everything from boot buckles to metal edges and chair lifts can wreak havoc on the materials. As a result, they are a tough bunch overall. The most common way of determining ski pant durability is the fabric denier (D), which measures the thickness of the threads used for the shell material. Most resort-oriented designs are pretty substantial, including the Patagonia Storm Shift (150D) and The North Face Freedom (140D x 160D). On the other end of the spectrum, touring-focused pants like the Patagonia Stormstride (40D) make the most compromises in durability to maximize comfort, mobility, and performance on the go. Our top-rated pants, the Arc’teryx Sabre and women's Sentinel do an excellent job of balancing needs for both activities with their high-quality 80D shells. It’s worth noting that many pants include a reinforced patch along the inside of the cuff (sometimes referred to as a scuff guard) for additional protection from ski edges.
Another “either/or” decision when choosing ski pants is whether to opt for regular ski pants or a bib. Pants are the traditional choice and what most folks are familiar and comfortable with. They’re completely capable of resort or backcountry skiing and are much easier to slip on and off. The primary downside is felt when cold air or moisture finds its way up your back on the chairlift or after taking a fall.
Bibs are the remedy for these maladies as they offer better protection from the snow, wind, and wet. They also run a little warmer thanks to the extra layering that covers part of your upper body. While you don’t have to worry about any discomfort from a waistband, the straps that run over your shoulders can take some getting used to (and you’ll need to dial in the fit to keep them from moving around excessively or interfering with your backpack's shoulder straps). But deep powder explorers or those who are prone to good falls may prefer bib-style pants. The Flylow Gear Baker, Trew Gear Chariot Primo, Flylow Gear Foxy, and REI First Chair GTX are a few of our favorite bib designs.
Pockets
Typically, your jacket or backpack will be your primary place to store personal items, but it’s still worth checking the pocket situation on a pair of ski pants you’re eyeing. We recommend looking for a couple of zippered pockets that can fit snacks or personal effects. Unless you really need the extra capacity, we’re not huge fans of cargo pockets for resort skiing—filling them with larger items feels ungainly on the mountain. Backcountry-specific pants like the Patagonia Stormstride and Black Diamond Recon Stretch put a greater emphasis on storage with dedicated pockets for items like an avalanche beacon.
Ventilation
To aid in breathability, most ski pants offer a zippered ventilation system that amounts to pit zips for your legs. The most common locations for the zippered panels are along the inside of your upper legs or on the outside of your thighs. Either style will help dump a lot of heat, although the former design adds unwanted bulk and can occasionally impact comfort. Backcountry-specific pants often place the zippers on the outside of the legs in part for this reason. The Flylow Gear Chemical and Donna pants have vents on both sides of the leg, which provide excellent cross ventilation.
Recco
You may run into Recco listed as a feature on some mid-range and high-end ski pants. These are for skiers who make their way out of bounds or into areas where they may experience avalanche dangers. The Recco reflector built into your ski jacket or pant is a passive unit that doesn’t require batteries and can be picked up by the Recco detectors often carried by resort search and rescue. They lack the technology and strong signal of a dedicated search and rescue beacon, but they do provide an additional safety measure should you venture off-trail. We've found the Recco System website helpful if you want more information about the technology.
The best fit, no matter the type of skier or boarder you are, will come down to personal preference. There are, however, some helpful generalizations to be made. Most beginner and intermediate downhill skiers opt for a comfortable fit that is neither too tight nor too baggy. Backcountry touring types lean towards a slimmer cut for easier uphill hiking, and those who spend time in the park are inclined to choose a loose, relaxed fit. In the end, the most important thing is to find a fit that’s comfortable for you. Our preference is a bit of a more tailored cut as long as it doesn't negatively mobility. And it needs to have enough room to comfortably throw on a light or midweight baselayer underneath.
In recent years, there’s been a noticeable shift in sustainable practices within the ski apparel market. Led by brands like Patagonia and REI Co-op, we’re seeing greater use of recycled materials, particularly in the shell and lining fabrics. Further, a growing number of products, including Patagonia’s latest Storm Shift and Powder Town collections, are using DWR coatings that are PFAS-free (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are non-biodegradable chemicals). Many brands also utilize the bluesign system for sourcing materials responsibly and have Fair Trade Certified-sewn gear, which helps ensure the fair and ethical treatment of workers. One final way to purchase sustainably is to select quality products and repair old gear rather than buy cheap items that don’t last. Patagonia is a leader here as well, with an excellent repair program that’s managed both online and in their brick-and-mortar stores.
The layers you wear under your ski pants don’t get as much attention as those warming your core, but they remain an important consideration nevertheless. To start, it’s almost always a good idea to throw on at least a thin pair of long underwear both for resort and backcountry skiing. The extra layer not only provides insulation and protection from cold snow and freezing chairlift seats, but it also wicks moisture away from your skin. Further, the interiors of ski pants are often not very plush, with exposed mesh, zippers, and minimalist liners that become less comfortable as the day wears on.
In choosing a baselayer, it’s worth getting a soft and close-fitting design to maximize warmth. The best models are made with either synthetic or wool—cotton doesn’t insulate when wet, so it’s a bad idea even on a resort day. Synthetics are the cheaper option and efficiently wick moisture, but merino wool is our favorite. It’s very warm for its weight and naturally resists odor better than a polyester alternative. Baselayers are offered in a range of thicknesses, including lightweight designs for warm days or backcountry use, and mid and heavyweight options for cold days at the resort. And in particularly frigid conditions, you can always double up your baselayers to increase warmth.
Back to Our Top Ski Pant Picks Back to Our Ski Pant Comparison Table