For midsummer conditions or high-exertion days on the trail, nothing beats the airy, barely-there feel of a hiking short. Today’s offerings run the gamut from technically savvy softshell designs to casually minded numbers that look at home both on and off the trail. Regardless of the style, most hiking-specific shorts feature durable, breathable, and quick-drying fabrics, functional storage, and a customizable fit at the waist. Our female editors have put dozens of shorts to the test over the years in search of the perfect hiking design, from hot and exposed outings in the Utah desert to multi-day treks in the Patagonia backcountry. Below we break down our 15 favorites of the year, with our analysis of fit, storage, performance, and more. For more information, see our buying advice and comparison table below the picks. And for a wider look at the market, including both men’s and women’s styles, check out our unisex hiking shorts round-up.
Editor's note: We updated this guide on August 19, 2024, to swap the Prana Halle Short II and Mountain Hardwear Dynama in our rankings, move Columbia’s Saturday Trail up as our top budget pick, and add several new shorts to the list, including the Oiselle Toolbelt Roga, Patagonia Maipo, and Smartwool Hike. We also removed a few discontinued shorts, included information about our testing practices, and added a section on sustainability to the buying advice.
Our Team's Women's Hiking Short Picks
- Best Overall Women's Hiking Shorts: Prana Halle II Short
- A Close Second (With a Better Waistband Design): Mtn Hardwear Dynama Bermuda
- Best Budget Hiking Shorts: Columbia Saturday Trail Long Shorts
- Best Performance-Oriented Hiking Shorts: Arc’teryx Gamma Short 9"
- Best Quick-Drying Hiking Shorts: Patagonia Baggies Shorts
- Best Running Shorts for Fast-and-Light Hiking: Oiselle Toolbelt Roga Shorts
- Best High-Rise Biker Shorts for Hiking: Patagonia Maipo Shorts
Best Overall Women’s Hiking Shorts
1. Prana Halle Short II 5" ($69)
Inseams: 5, 7 in.
Materials: 95% nylon, 5% elastane
Waist: One-button fly, mid-rise
What we like: Versatile styling for hiking and wearing casually; ReZion fabric is durable and doesn’t stretch out of shape.
What we don’t: Waistband is slightly bulky and non-adjustable; no zippered storage.
Right away, we’ll admit that it wasn’t an easy decision choosing our favorite women’s hiking shorts—there’s no one-size-fits-all option, and preferences on things like fit and pockets vary widely. But as a design that puts it all together better than most, we’ve found a lot to like in Prana’s Halle Short II. First is its crossover appeal for casual hiking and around-town use: The Halle features a nice balance of trail-ready features alongside a stylish look (offered in 5- and 7-in. versions), a traditional button-and-fly closure, and a modest mid-rise waist that lends great coverage for high-stepping over boulders or bending over while setting up a tent. We’re big fans of Prana's ReZion fabric, too: Reminiscent of a lightweight softshell material, it has a premium and durable feel that resists abrasion and doesn’t stretch out over time (this is one of our common complaints with hiking shorts).
However, as we alluded to above, the Halle II does have some drawbacks. Our main gripe is the waistband, which has no way of cinching tighter (unless you add a belt) and is prone to digging into our stomach when compressed under a backpack’s hipbelt. What’s more, we found ourselves in between sizes with the Prana, with the bigger option being a bit baggy and the other being too tight—the lack of wiggle room at the waist made it hard to find a true middle ground. Finally, while the front pockets are reasonably deep, the back pockets are too small for a smartphone (not to mention that the flaps get in the way), and the shorts don’t feature any zippered storage. But if you can nail a good fit, the Halle II is an overall capable and well-rounded hiking design that looks the part around town, too. And if the button-and-fly closure is a dealbreaker, check out the Halle E-Waist Short II, which features a lower-profile elastic waistband.
See the Prana Halle II Short 5" See the Prana Halle II Short 7"
A Close Second (With a Better Waistband Design)
2. Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda ($70)
Inseam: 9 in.
Materials: 94% nylon, 6% elastane
Waist: Elastic with drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: Stretchy waistband and thin fabric offer excellent fit and comfort.
What we don’t: Not particularly stylish or durable, minimal secure storage, and only offered in one inseam length.
Our favorite hiking shorts are durable, breathable, and quick-drying, offer great fit and mobility, feature a range of storage options, and look good to boot. The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda checks all the boxes better than most, with lightweight fabric that dries quickly after a dousing, two deep hand pockets and a zippered stash at the thigh (plus a flap-protected pocket at the rear), and a modest 9-inch inseam. Notably, the shorts are also built with a wide, stretchy, and drawcord-equipped waistband, which slides smoothly over our hips (some elastic waistbands are painstakingly hard to get on) and does a great job keeping the shorts in place while minimizing bulk and pressure points under a backpack hipbelt (unlike the Halle II above). Added up, the Dynama Bermuda is one of the most well-rounded shorts we’ve tested for hikers who prioritize both comfort and performance.
But the Dynama isn’t ideal for every woman on the trail for a few key reasons. First is storage: We wish Mountain Hardwear included more than one zippered pocket, although the rear pocket is semi-secure with a fabric flap covering the opening (but not secure enough that we’d recommend stashing any valuables here). Second, while the thin fabric excels in terms of mobility and breathability, it lacks the premium feel of offerings from Patagonia and Arc’teryx—our shorts started to fade and pill after just a few washings. And finally, the muted colorway choices aren't too exciting. But despite our gripes, these Mountain Hardwear shorts excel in comfort, fit, and coverage, earning them a spot high on our list this season.
See the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda
Best Budget Hiking Shorts
3. Columbia Saturday Trail Long Shorts ($55)
Inseams: 10, 12 in.
Materials: 96% nylon, 4% elastane
Waist: Two-button fly, mid-rise
What we like: A great hot-weather option at a low price.
What we don’t: Not the most flattering fit and fabric tends to pill.
Not everyone will want to spend upwards of $70 on a hiking short, making the Columbia Saturday Trail a nice solution for budget shoppers. Priced at just $55 and available in both 10- and 12-inch inseams, the design features straight legs, a mid-rise waist, and a fairly traditional two-button-and-fly closure. In addition to the two inseam options, you also get the choice between standard (2 to 18) or plus sizes (16W to 24W), making the Saturday Trail a nice option for those who often struggle with fit. Top it off with a light and stretchy build that’s great for keeping you cool and comfortable on hot summer hikes, and there’s a lot to like about Columbia’s wallet-friendly shorts.
What are the downsides? First, while the Saturday Trail features two hand pockets, two rear pockets, and a zippered pocket on the right thigh, none is large enough to securely stash a smartphone. As we touched on in the Halle II write-up above, we’re also not big fans of button-and-fly closures, which can cause discomfort when worn under a backpack hipbelt. Finally, the Columbia’s longer inseam detracts from mobility and breathability in hot conditions (although this will ultimately come down to a matter of personal preference). But for only $55 and often found on sale, the Saturday Trail Stretch is an adventure-ready option at a great price. Within Columbia’s value-oriented lineup, we also like their Anytime Outdoor Long Shorts, which are slightly longer (13 in.) but have a lower-profile waistband, along with the quick-drying Sandy River collection for days on the water.
See the Columbia Saturday Trail Long Shorts
Best Performance-Oriented Hiking Shorts
4. Arc’teryx Gamma Short 9" ($120)
Inseams: 6, 9 in.
Materials: 88% nylon, 12% elastane
Waist: One-snap fly, built-in belt, mid-rise
What we like: Premium fit and finish, highly durable, functional storage.
What we don’t: Expensive and too thick for hot weather.
Most hiking shorts check in around $60 to $70, so you know the Gamma Short must have something different up its sleeve. Priced at $120 for the 9-inch version, the Arc'teryx is by far the most premium offering here and a great option for dedicated hikers looking for top-notch performance. Following in the footsteps of the much-loved Gamma Pant, these shorts are made with Arc’teryx’s Fortius DW 2.0 softshell fabric, which translates to excellent durability, a great balance of wind protection and breathability, and a generous bit of stretch to keep mobility high. The built-in belt offers a customizable fit without too much bulk, and storage is the best in the game with three large zippered pockets (two are sized to fit a smartphone, and the thigh storage is accessible while wearing a climbing harness).
The Gamma has just about everything going for it, but you’ll have to ask yourself if you need such a technically oriented short—especially when you can save over $50 with many of the other models here. Further, the Fortius softshell fabric runs warm on particularly hot days, and it won’t dry out as quickly as thinner nylon designs like the Dynama above. But you’d be hard-pressed to find a more durable and functional hiking short, making the Gamma the crème de la crème for mountain-goers, guides, and outdoor professionals looking for a premium daily driver. Finally, it doesn’t hurt that Arc’teryx’s offerings are reliably well-fitting, and the Gamma (which comes in 6- and 9-in. versions) is offered in ten sizes from 00 to 16. There’s also a 5-inch Gamma Utility variation available, which features dual-entry pockets at the front for additional storage.
See the Arc'teryx Gamma Short 9" See the Arc'teryx Gamma Short 6"
Best Quick-Drying Hiking Shorts
5. Patagonia Baggies Shorts ($59)
Inseams: 2.5 , 5 in.
Materials: 100% nylon
Waist: Elastic with drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: Quick-drying fabric is great for hiking and water-based activities; fun styling.
What we don’t: Storage is lacking and fit doesn’t work for everyone.
The Patagonia Baggies are just about as classic as it gets. These versatile shorts fit the part for everything from hiking and water sports to everyday use, and their fun designs and colorways make them a crowd favorite, year after year. The formula is very simple: The shorts feature an elastic waist with drawcord, two mesh-lined pockets (great for draining water), a key loop to secure valuables, and a 5-inch inseam (Patagonia also offers the Barely Baggies with a 2.5-in. inseam). Added up, you get a board-short-inspired aesthetic with the functionality of a hiking short, great for hot summer days and quick dips along the trail. And with a recent update, the Baggies are now built with Patagonia’s NetPlus fabric, which is made exclusively from recycled fishing nets.
For years, the Baggies have been our short of choice for hot-weather hiking, namely due to their fun vibe and quick-drying design. But we do have a few gripes, including storage, comfort, and fit. The hand pockets aren’t attached to the legs—meaning the contents can hang below the hem—and aside from the key loop, there’s no security for essentials like a wallet or phone (by contrast, The North Face’s similar Class V Pathfinder below has a rear zippered pocket). Further, the Baggies are a little stiff and tend to ride up around the crotch (we find that we’re often pulling ours down), and the elastic waistband isn’t as comfortable as sleeker designs like the Dynama above. And finally, fit can be difficult for women with hourglass shapes (the shorts are a pain to pull on and narrow in the hip region), although the newest version does offer some improvement with a higher rise. No short is perfect, and if the Baggie fits, it’s a wonderful and quick-drying companion for hot days both on the trail and in town.
See the Patagonia Baggies Shorts
Best Running Shorts for Fast-and-Light Hiking
6. Oiselle Toolbelt Roga Shorts ($62)
Inseams: 4, 6 in.
Materials: 86% polyester, 14% spandex
Waist: Elastic with drawcord, low/mid-rise
What we like: Light, airy, and highly tear-resistant; wraparound mesh waistband pockets are great for stashing valuables.
What we don’t: Minimal coverage and limited colorway options.
Many female editors at Switchback Travel love wearing running shorts while hiking. In addition to being light and airy, they offer great mobility, dry out quickly, and often cost a little less than hiking designs due to their minimalist constructions. In this category, Oiselle’s Toolbelt Roga Shorts stand out as a longtime staff favorite. While thin, the shorts’ stretch-woven fabric gives rather than tears under pressure, translating to exceptional durability—we have yet to put a hole in our pair despite months’ worth of running and hiking. Storage is a highlight, as well—especially for a running design: The wraparound mesh waistband pocket can fit everything from an energy bar to a smartphone, and the zippered stash at the rear is great for valuables. For fast-moving day hikes and other objectives when you want to maximize freedom of movement without compromising on toughness or storage, the Toolbelt Roga Shorts are hard to beat.
All that said, there are a couple reasons we only included one running short on this list. First, while we’ve found the Toolbelt Roga to be surprisingly durable for a running design, its thin build won’t hold up as well over time to frequent trail use—dollar for dollar, hiking shorts will almost certainly provide more value in the long run. The 4-inch inseam is also pretty short, resulting in minimal protection from the elements—including sun, wind, insects, and branches (Oiselle does offer the Long Toolbelt Roga Shorts with a 6-in. inseam). But from a comfort perspective, the Oiselle shorts are truly easy-wearing, and the fact that storage is better than many hiking designs here is a testament to their all-around versatility. Another well-equipped running design we like is Patagonia’s Multi Trails, which boasts a longer 5.5-inch inseam and comes in a wider selection of colorways.
See the Oiselle Toolbelt Roga Shorts See the Long Toolbelt Roga Shorts
Best High-Waisted Biker Shorts for Hiking
7. Patagonia Maipo Shorts ($69)
Inseam: 8 in.
Materials: 81% nylon, 19% spandex
Waist: Elastic, high-rise
What we like: Secure and comfortable waistband, great mobility, and nice sustainability focus.
What we don’t: More prone to tears than traditional hiking shorts; not the most breathable or quick to dry.
High-waisted biker shorts are having a moment, and they’re as practical on the trail as they are in the yoga studio. There are a number of hiking-ready models to choose from, but we think the Patagonia Maipo Shorts here offer the best combination of style, function, and price. For $69, the Maipo features a stylish high-rise waistband that’s unobtrusive and stays in place, a fairly modest 8-inch inseam, and two generously sized thigh pockets that fit everything from your phone and wallet to a small camera. As we’ve come to expect from the brand, the Maipo Shorts are also very sustainably minded with Patagonia’s NetPlus fabric made from recycled fishing nets, bluesign-approved materials, and certification to the Fair Trade standard.
However, it’s important to be aware of the trade-offs in opting for a tight-fitting short like the Maipo. First, its thin and stretchy fabric will form holes and tears a lot faster than other shorts here, especially if subjected to sharp branches and abrasive boulders. What’s more, the elastic-heavy design can’t resist moisture as well as 100% nylon or polyester builds, meaning the shorts will grow wet and stay wet for longer. And finally, we don’t recommend such a tight-fitting short for particularly hot days on the trail—you’ll likely want something thinner and more free-flowing. But for casual outings and mild summer days, high-waisted biker shorts can certainly lend a stylish flair without giving up much in the way of performance. Another option we really like is the Fjallraven Abisko Short Tights.
See the Patagonia Maipo Shorts
Best of the Rest
8. REI Co-op Sahara Bermuda ($60)
Inseam: 9 in.
Materials: 96% nylon, 4% spandex
Waist: One-button fly, drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: A quick-drying, traditional design at a solid value.
What we don’t: Not particularly durable and will stretch out in between washings.
Over the years, REI Co-op has vastly improved their in-house offerings, and the Sahara Bermuda shorts are a case in point. These are the full package for everything from casual day hikes and longer overnights, offering great coverage with the mid-rise waist and 9-inch inseam, four pockets (including one with a zipper), and lightweight, quick-drying fabric with a bit of give. We particularly like the recent redesign, which subs in a patch of elastic at the back of the waistband for a closer fit (you also get a drawstring inside the button-and-fly closure). Priced at $60 and available in a healthy range of sizes, the Sahara Bermuda is an excellent all-rounder that gets the job done for women looking for a functional and modest short for summer adventuring.
But while the Sahara Bermuda’s lightweight fabric makes it a great companion for hot days on the trail, it’s far from the most durable or premium here. The shorts will stretch out between washings (particularly important if you plan to wear them on a week-long backpacking trip) and are much more prone to abrasion and pilling than a design like the Gamma above. And while the elastic waistband will help maintain a good fit over time, it’s a bit of a polarizing feature (those looking for a traditional design might not love it). Finally, REI only offers a couple muted colorways and one length, and none of the pockets on our size 4 fit a smartphone. But nitpicks aside, the Sahara Bermuda offers a thoughtful take on the standard hiking short design and fits the part whether you’re hitting the trail, headed to the lake, or running errands in between. At the time of publishing, it looks like the Bermuda may be on the way out for the season, so snatch them up at a discount while you still can.
See the REI Co-op Sahara Bermuda
9. Topo Designs Dirt Shorts ($79)
Inseam: 3.5 in.
Materials: 98% cotton, 2% spandex
Waist: Elastic with drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: Cotton build is comfortable and stylish; well-designed pockets; fun colorways.
What we don’t: Not ideal for hot or potentially wet days.
The vast majority of hiking shorts are built with nylon or polyester, which do a good job wicking moisture, dry out quickly, and offer great freedom of movement with their lightweight and airy builds. Going against the grain are Topo Designs’ Dirt Shorts, which feature a 98%-organic-cotton build for a solid dose of comfort and style. In fact, comfort is the first thing we noticed about the Dirt Shorts, which are soft and supple against the skin and have a noticeable amount of stretch for moving around. Further, the side-seam pockets are massive and positioned perfectly, and you get two stylish rear pockets, too. For dry and moderate conditions (they were perfect for our April hiking trip in Moab), these are a cozy and stylish alternative to many of the more traditional, synthetic hiking shorts here.
But before you spring for the Dirt Shorts, it’s important to be aware of the shortcomings of cotton. When used in hiking shorts, cotton is overall thicker and warmer than nylon or polyester and does not dry out as quickly when wet. Further, it lacks the airy and free-flowing feel of synthetic blends—you won’t want to wear these on particularly hot days. In addition, the overall design of the Dirt Shorts is far from performance-minded: The waistband is a little thick and bulky (not great for wearing under a burly hipbelt), the 3.5-inch inseam will be too short for some, and zippered storage is lacking (the zippered mesh compartment inside the back pocket can fit keys but not much else). But as a nice crossover option for casual and outdoor use, the Dirt Shorts are one of our favorite designs here. For a similar alternative with a built-in belt rather than a drawcord, check out Topo Designs’ Mountain Shorts.
See the Topo Designs Dirt Shorts
10. Patagonia Quandary Shorts 5” ($75)
Inseams: 5, 7 in.
Materials: 96% nylon, 4% spandex
Waist: One-button fly, drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: A high-quality traditional hiking short available in two inseam lengths and 12 sizes.
What we don’t: Button and drawcord have a tendency to dig into the stomach.
If you like the traditional look of the Sahara Bermuda above but prefer something a little shorter, the Patagonia Quandary is a great option. This is another lightweight hiking short that offers a good deal of function without too many bells and whistles: You get two pockets at the front and two at the rear (one with a zipper), a standard button-and-fly closure with an internal drawcord, and a good dose of stretch throughout. We wore the Quandary shorts on a four-day trek through Patagonia’s Río Eléctrico valley and were impressed with their mobile and quick-drying nature: After soaking the shorts on a river crossing, they were completely dry in just 20 minutes.
The Quandary is a great option for those looking for standard hiking-short fare, and—like most of Patagonia’s offerings—they’re well built and feature high-quality materials, though many users feel that they run on the small side. Additionally, this style of hiking short won’t appeal to everyone, especially when a more modern design like the Prana Halle above offers similar performance. Finally, after testing many hiking shorts with sleek elastic waistbands (like the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda above), we have a hard time choosing shorts with buttons and drawcords—both of which are noticeably bulky under the hipbelt of a backpack. But the Quandary is nevertheless a durable and functional option, and Patagonia offers two inseams (5 and 7 in.) in 12 sizes from 0 to 22.
See the Patagonia Quandary Shorts 5" See the Patagonia Quandary Shorts 7"
11. Outdoor Research Ferrosi Shorts 5" ($79)
Inseams: 5, 7, 9 in.
Materials: 86% nylon, 14% spandex
Waist: Elastic with built-in belt, mid/high-rise
What we like: OR’s Ferrosi fabric is very durable, comfortable, breathable, and mobile.
What we don’t: The elastic waistband is a pain to pull on over our hips.
Outdoor Research’s stretchy Ferrosi fabric has achieved legendary status amongst hikers, climbers, and skiers, prized for its great mobility, abrasion resistance, breathability, and weather protection. OR uses the lightweight softshell material in everything from jackets and pants to gaiters and skorts—along with the women’s hiking shorts here. Notably, the Ferrosi shorts are available in two different styles—the 5- and 9-inch models have an elastic waistband with built-in belt, while the 7-inch design has a more traditional button and fly closure with an internal drawcord (there’s also a 12-in Over Short variation, which features a button and fly but no drawcord). Regardless of which model you choose, you’re getting a durable short with a bit more heft than thinner models like the Dynama and Sahara Bermuda above.
We tested the 5-inch Ferrosi Shorts, which come in five fun colorways (we especially love the contrasting belt design) and six sizes from XS to XXL (the same design comes in a 9-in. plus-size version, too). We really liked the look of the shorts, and the high-rise waist extended well above our belly button and offered a really nice amount of coverage. However, we weren’t huge fans of the waistband design—getting it over our hips required a lot of wiggling and pulling (similar to our experience with the Patagonia Baggies)—although the shorts did fit quite well once on. Further, while the built-in belt is nice for aesthetics, it’s a bit superfluous when paired with the elastic —so much so that we often forget to tighten it. Importantly, we haven’t had a chance yet to test the 7-inch version but suspect they might be a better option for women with wide hips. But if you can nail the fit, it’s hard to find fault with the Ferrosi fabric, which moves well with the body and, based on our experience, will stand the test of time.
See the OR Ferrosi Shorts 5" See the OR Ferrosi Shorts 7"
12. Smartwool Hike Short ($60)
Inseam: 4 in.
Materials: 86% polyester, 14% elastane
Waist: Two-snap fly, drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: Moisture-wicking lining and waistband, flattering fit, and very comfortable.
What we don’t: Only offered in a single, short inseam length; sizing runs a little small.
Smartwool is an industry leader in merino wool products—from socks to baselayers—and we’re happy to see them branching out into the hiking shorts space. Their Hike Short here incorporates the prized material along the waistband and lining, resulting in great moisture wicking and minimal sweat buildup. The rest of the shorts boast a fairly standard but practical mix of polyester and elastane, which allows for unrestricted freedom of movement whether you’re high-stepping over blowdowns on the trail or jumping over a stream to avoid getting your hiking shoes wet. While entirely subjective, we also love the look of the Hike Short, which offers similar trail-to-town appeal as our top-ranked Prana Halle II.
All told, there’s a lot to like about the Smartwool Hike Short: It’s comfortable, good-looking, wicks moisture better than many designs here thanks to the addition of merino wool, and is competitively priced for what you get. However, the 4-inch inseam is relatively short, and sizing runs on the smaller end, making it a safe bet that many women will want to size up. Colorway options are also pretty limited currently, and we wish Smartwool had included more than one zippered pocket for stashing valuables. But all in all, the Hike Short is a competitive addition to the market and one of the most flattering designs here for wearing both outdoors and around town. Now is a great time to grab a pair as, at the time of publishing, the Hike Short is heavily discounted.
See the Smartwool Hike Short
13. The North Face Class V Pathfinder Pull-On Shorts ($60)
Inseams: 2.5, 4 in.
Materials: 94% nylon, 6% elastane
Waist: Elastic with drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: Cheaper than the Patagonia Baggies with a rear zip pocket.
What we don’t: Pockets aren’t mesh-lined; slightly large and baggy fit.
A direct competitor to the Patagonia Baggies above, The North Face’s Class V Pathfinder Pull-On Shorts are an ideal choice for hot-weather hiking, water sports, and everyday use. Like the Baggies, they feature a nylon build that prioritizes moisture wicking but with a bit of elastane for added stretch, along with an elastic waistband and internal drawcord for dialing in fit. In our opinion, the 4-inch inseam also provides a nice middle ground between the 5-inch Baggies and shorter options here. Tack on a rear zip pocket (an improvement over Patagonia’s overly simplistic design), and a nice selection of vibrant patterns and colorways, and the Class V Shorts stand out as a fun and well-equipped pick for summer adventuring.
But a few gripes push the Class V Shorts down our list. First, the hand pockets lack a mesh lining, which we’ve found helpful for quick draining during days on the water. The fit may also pose issues for some: Those with thicker thighs might experience bunching and riding up, and the shorts run on the larger and baggier end (we recommend trying them on before you buy, but sizing down is a pretty safe bet). But if you’re on the hunt for an alternative to the Baggies, The North Face Class V Shorts are a slightly more affordable option with a fun cut and length, and we love the drawcord and additional rear zip pocket. They’re also offered with a built-in belt for $5 more.
See The North Face Class V Pathfinder Pull-On Shorts
14. Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender Short ($89)
Inseam: 4.5 in.
Materials: 100% polyester
Waist: Elastic with drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: Extremely light without feeling overly compromised.
What we don’t: We don’t love Mountain Hardwear’s recent updates; expensive for what you get.
The second Mountain Hardwear design to make our list this season is their lightweight Trail Sender, which feels a lot like a pair of running shorts. Importantly, however, the Trail Sender doesn’t feel overly compromised: You still get decent storage, including two deep, flap-protected hand pockets and a zippered pocket at the right thigh that easily swallows a small wallet and keys (although it can’t accommodate a smartphone). Mountain Hardwear also kept things relatively streamlined with a drawcord-equipped elasticized waistband, and the 100%-polyester ripstop fabric offers great breathability, fends off snags and tears well, and gives the shorts a light and airy feel. In sum, the Trail Sender is a great pick for everything from fast-and-light thru hikes to mid-summer hiking and backpacking missions.
Mountain Hardwear recently updated the Trail Sender, and we have to admit we’re not huge fans of most of the changes. First, we liked the prior version’s snaps to secure the hand pockets shut, while the latest version has basic—and noticeably large—fabric flaps. The drawcord has also been moved from inside to outside the waistband, and the waistband itself is wider (a positive) but bulkier. Finally, while we appreciate the added coverage of the latest Trail Sender’s 1.5-inch-longer inseam, it detracts from the shorts’ barely-there feel (and likely contributes to the $14 jump in cost). But we do like the sleeker leg openings, and the Trail Sender still offers excellent all-around mobility and comfort. All told, if you like the fit and feel of running shorts but don’t want to compromise on storage, these could be just the ticket.
See the Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender Short
15. Kuhl Freeflex Cargo Shorts ($89)
Inseam: 10 in.
Materials: 100% polyester
Waist: One-snap fly, drawcord, mid-rise
What we like: An inclusive hiking short with modest coverage and a healthy size selection.
What we don’t: Dated styling and fabric; pockets are difficult to access.
Kuhl’s Freeflex Cargo might not be the hippest shorts, but what they forfeit in style they more than make up for in function and coverage. With a 10-inch inseam, the Freeflex Cargo are the longest shorts on this list, which translates to protection from the elements and a modest fit for a range of body types (the shorts are available in 11 sizes from 0 to 20W). Traditional cargo-style side pockets and back pockets with flaps keep your essentials secure, and a drawcord helps dial in a good fit at the waist. Added up, the Freeflex Cargo Shorts are a nice option for women in search of a traditionally minded hiking short that’s high on coverage.
Kuhl claims that their Freeflex fabric is 100% polyester, but in our experience, it features a healthy dose of stretch and is thicker than most synthetic blends here. The result is decent freedom of movement and great durability, but the flip side is that the Cargo Shorts aren’t a great hot-weather option and won’t dry quickly after a solid dousing. And while you do get ample storage, it’s not particularly useful—while nice for security and style, the flaps make the pockets’ contents difficult to access, and none are large enough to accommodate a smartphone. It’s also worth mentioning that Kuhl offers the standard Freeflex Shorts, which feature a more modern design with an 8-inch inseam, wide elastic waistband, and zippered front pockets.
See the Kuhl Freeflex Cargo Shorts
Women's Hiking Short Comparison Table
Hiking Short | Price | Inseam | Materials | Waist | Pockets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prana Halle Short II 5" | $69 | 5, 7 in. | 95% nylon, 5% elastane | Button & fly | 5 |
Mountain Hardwear Dynama | $70 | 9 in. | 94% nylon, 6% elastane | Elastic | 4 |
Columbia Saturday Trail Long | $55 | 10, 12 in. | 96% nylon, 4% elastane | Button & fly | 5 |
Arc’teryx Gamma Short 9" | $120 | 6, 9 in. | 88% nylon, 12% elastane | Snap, fly, & belt | 3 |
Patagonia Baggies Shorts | $59 | 2.5, 5 in. | 100% nylon | Elastic & drawcord | 2 |
Oiselle Toolbelt Roga Shorts | $62 | 4, 6 in. | 86% poly, 14% spandex | Elastic & drawcord | 5 |
Patagonia Maipo Shorts | $69 | 8 in. | 81% nylon, 19% spandex | Elastic | 2 |
REI Co-op Sahara Bermuda | $60 | 9 in. | 96% nylon, 4% spandex | Button, fly, & drawcord | 4 |
Topo Designs Dirt Shorts | $79 | 3.5 in. | 98% cotton, 2% spandex | Elastic & drawcord | 4 |
Patagonia Quandary Shorts 5” | $75 | 5, 7 in. | 96% nylon, 4% spandex | Button, fly, & drawcord | 4 |
Outdoor Research Ferrosi 5" | $79 | 5, 7, 9 in. | 86% nylon, 14% spandex | Elastic & belt | 4 |
Smartwool Hike Short | $60 | 4 in. | 86% poly, 14% elastane | Snap, fly, & drawcord | 5 |
The North Face Class V Shorts | $60 | 2.5, 4 in. | 94% nylon, 6% elastane | Elastic & drawcord | 3 |
Mtn Hardwear Trail Sender | $89 | 4.5 in. | 100% polyester | Elastic & drawcord | 3 |
Kuhl Freeflex Cargo Shorts | $89 | 10 in. | 100% polyester | Snap, fly, & drawcord | 6 |
About Our Testing Process
Hiking is a favorite pastime among the Switchback Travel staff, and we love the ventilated and quick-drying nature of hiking shorts in the summer months. To complement our unisex hiking shorts guide, our female editors selected over a dozen hiking shorts to bring along on a testing trip to Moab, Utah, in the spring of 2022. There, we embarked on several day hikes in Arches National Park and around Fischer Towers, landing on 15 standout designs that made our first iteration of this guide in May of that same year. Former senior editor Jenny Abegg managed the guide until her departure from Switchback in 2024, passing the torch to managing editor Sarah Nelson. Both Jenny and Sarah have spent considerable time in the backcountry and, as a result, have a keen eye for quality, capable hiking shorts.
When we test hiking shorts, we consider several factors in order to evaluate overall performance. Construction has a big impact on durability, moisture wicking, breathability, and mobility (among other performance considerations), so we can tell a lot just by looking at a short’s materials. To confirm our initial impressions, we take each pair out into the wilderness, stuffing the pockets full of on-trail essentials, dunking the shorts in bodies of water to see how quickly they dry, and adjusting any belts or drawcords to dial in a good fit. As new and noteworthy designs hit the market, we’ll be sure to continue updating the list above based on our experiences in the field. And if you frequently travel off-trail or simply prefer some added coverage, we’ve taken a similar approach with our round-up of the best women’s hiking pants.
Women's Hiking Short Buying Advice
- What Defines a Hiking Short?
- Wearing Running Shorts for Hiking
- Hiking Short Materials
- Thickness and Durability
- Quick-Drying Hiking Shorts
- Waistband Styles
- Pockets
- Inseams and Length
- Sizing and Fit
- Sustainability
- Hiking Shorts vs. Hiking Pants
What Defines a Hiking Short?
There’s certainly no rulebook on hiking attire, and women take to the trail in everything from running shorts and high-waisted biker shorts to quick-drying water-ready designs. Depending on the conditions and day’s objective, these might even be your best option. That said, there's also a cadre of shorts purpose-built for hiking, which tout features like durable and breathable fabrics, functional storage, modest coverage, waist belts that fit securely and ride comfortably underneath a backpack hipbelt, and more. If you're looking for the best-performing and longest-lasting tool for the job, hiking shorts are a great place to start. And the good news is that there's something for everyone, from technical, performance-minded offerings to more casual pieces that look just as good at the brewery as they do on the trail.
Wearing Running Shorts for Hiking
We'll be honest: You'll often catch us wearing running shorts while hiking. Running shorts are lightweight, offer great comfort and freedom of movement, and dry quickly, too—they're especially great for particularly hot days or when mixing some running in on your hike. However, there are a number of clear downsides. For one, storage is lacking: some running shorts have no pockets, while others have just one or two small pouches. Second, durability is not a strong suit: Running shorts' thin build won't hold up well to trail abuse, and dollar-for-dollar hiking shorts will certainly provide a lot more value over time. Finally, with short inseams and minimal fabric, running shorts will do little to protect your legs from the elements, including the sun, wind and cold, pesky bugs, and sharp branches. But we do love the comfort they provide, and think that hiking shorts should take some tips from running shorts when it comes to simple yet comfortable waistbands and free-flowing designs.
For those who like the idea of hiking in a running short, there are a few designs that stand out to us as more capable than others. We particularly love the Oiselle Toolbelt Roga Shorts, which feature a four-way stretch woven fabric that gives rather than tears, translating to exceptional durability—we've worn this short for months' worth of days on the trail (both running and hiking), and have yet to put a hole in it. Storage is excellent as well: The wraparound mesh waistband pocket can fit everything from an energy bar to a smartphone, and a secure zip stash at the rear is great for valuables. We've also found Patagonia's Multi Trail Shorts to be very practical, with two zippered front pockets and one back snap pocket. Of course, neither of these shorts can match the durability, features, and protection of a purpose-built hiking short, but the added mobility, style, and comfort will be well worth it for some.
Hiking Short Materials
Like hiking pants, most hiking shorts are made of nylon or polyester. These materials are reasonably durable, moisture-wicking, and breathable, and their lightweight makeup offers great freedom of movement. Many designs—like our top-ranked Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda and Prana Halle II—also incorporate a small amount of built-in stretch via elastane (spandex), which is a real boon for everything from high-stepping over logs to setting up camp. The added give and thickness also makes these shorts among the most durable here, great for brushing up against rock and branches, sitting on rough surfaces, and withstanding the wear and tear of a heavy backpack.
We’ve also included a small handful of outliers on this list. The Topo Designs Dirt Shorts for example, are made with 98% cotton, a rarity these days in outdoor clothing. In general, cotton lacks the durability and mobility of nylon or polyester, and unlike the synthetic blends it absorbs water, meaning it’s not as quick-drying and can get heavy when wet. But the upside is that the Topo Designs is impressively comfortable and stylish, which is all some hikers need for casual days on the trail. And then there are stretchy, spandex shorts like the Patagonia Maipo, which contain 19% elastic for a very snug, yoga-inspired design. In the end, it’s a good idea to tailor your hiking short choice to your objective: We prefer stretch-nylon blends for serious hiking, 100%-nylon shorts for water sports, and cotton or fitted designs for more casual days out.
Thickness and Durability
One of the headlining features of a hiking short is durability, especially when compared to casual or running-specific designs. Hiking shorts are meant to take a beating on trail and around camp, and ideally should last you seasons of use. However, we still see a lot of variation within the category: As mentioned above, nylon and polyester shorts are generally more robust than cotton styles, and (in most cases) thicker designs are more resistant to abrasion. We've also found that some—but not too much—added stretch can increase durability, allowing a fabric to give rather than tear when stressed.
Considering the factors above, one of the most durable shorts here is the Arc'teryx Gamma, which features a stretchy and relatively thick softshell fabric. And it's also worth noting that there are some exceptions to these rules: The Oiselle Toolbelt Roga Shorts, for example, use a stretch-woven fabric that’s impressively tear-resistant despite being notably thin (we’ve found them far more durable than most other running designs). What's more, one of our testers wore a pair of Patagonia Baggies (relatively thin nylon with no stretch) for over five seasons of mountain guiding without sustaining a single hole or tear.
Quick-Drying Hiking Shorts
When you're hiking in the heat of summer, nothing beats a refreshing dip in a trail-side lake or stream. Most of the hiking shorts above will dry out fairly quickly in warm and sunny conditions, but thin, nylon designs are the best tool for the job, including the Patagonia Baggies and The North Face Class V. On the other hand, thicker synthetic shorts or those with more added stretch (for example, the Arc'teryx Gamma and Patagonia Maipo) tend to absorb more water, and cotton is the worst culprit of all. Many shorts will also add a durable water-repellent (DWR) finish to keep water from penetrating the fabric, but keep in mind that this can degrade over time. In the end, if you're looking for a quick-drying short for trail-side swimming and other water-based activities, your best bet is a thin, nylon design with a relatively short inseam, mesh pockets, and not too much added bulk at the waist (running shorts work well, too).
Waistband Styles
Trying to find a pair of hiking shorts that fits well is a daunting and often futile task. Regardless of body shape, it seems that there’s always an area that’s too tight or too loose (in fact, it’s for this reason that we often find ourselves resorting to running shorts). That said, the ability to customize a short’s waistband can go a long way in terms of fit. Hiking short waistbands run the gamut from standard button-and-fly closures with belt loops to more modern designs, including fitted elastic waistbands, integrated belts, and drawstrings. In almost every case, we prefer the sleekness of the latter styles over the bulkiness of an added belt.
Our favorite waist design is a low-profile spandex band, as seen on shorts like the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda and Trail Sender above. These waistbands lie flat against the body, offer ample stretch, and are generally quite soft and comfortable. Importantly, their streamlined build doesn’t get in the way of a backpack hipbelt or cause awkward pressure points throughout the day, as we've experienced with button-and-fly or drawstring styles. Shorts like the Patagonia Baggies and Outdoor Research Ferrosi also build a strip of elastic into their waistbands, but they’re overall less sleek and fitted than the panel-like designs seen in more modern offerings. Built-in belts are another great option for tailoring fit at the waist and are found on some of the more performance-oriented options here (like the Arc’teryx Gamma), but you'll want to make sure they're fairly low-profile if you're wearing a backpacking pack. Finally, some shorts use a drawstring at the waist, which allows you to get a good fit but does add some extra bulk near the belly button.
Pockets
Having functional storage is one of our main requirements for a hiking short, but it’s also one of our largest complaints. Ideally, we want a pair of shorts to be able to fit a smartphone in at least one of its pockets, and secure items like a key or chapstick in a zip pocket. Unfortunately, these features aren’t always present; if storage is important to you, you’ll have to shop discriminately. That said, all of the shorts listed above include at least one pocket, and many sport upwards of four or five: two on the front, two at the back, and perhaps one on the side (keep in mind though, these aren’t always super functional). Given that the topic of pockets and storage is so important to us, we make sure to call it out in the write-ups above.
Inseams and Length
The hiking shorts on our list come in a range of lengths, which are most commonly measured in terms of the inseam (the length from the crotch seam to the hem). These span from the Patagonia Barely Baggies (2.5 in.) to the Columbia Saturday Trail Long (12 in.). We also often see shorts offered in two or more inseam options, such as the Outdoor Research Ferrosi (5, 7, and 9 in., as well as a 12-in. Over Short variation).
The length of short you choose will predominantly come down to a matter of personal preference, although it’s important to acknowledge that longer shorts do offer more protection from both the sun and sharp objects like branches and boulders (on the other hand, shorter designs generally provide more freedom of movement and ventilation). Finally, keep in mind that some manufacturers also list an outseam measurement, which specifies the length from the waist to the hem. The outseam can give you an idea of how high-waisted the short might be, which many hikers will appreciate for added coverage when bending over and high-stepping over trail obstacles.
Sizing and Fit
We’ve put up with our fair share of baggy, ill-fitting hiking shorts over the years, but the good news is that the market has improved significantly of late, incorporating stretchy fabrics and features like sleek elastic waistbands and gussets for better range of motion. Many brands have also expanded their lineups to include a range of plus-sized options, which we’re happy to see (REI Co-op and Outdoor Research are leaders in this movement). And as we mentioned above, it’s common for a short to come in two different inseam lengths—the Prana Halle II, for example, is offered in 5-inch and 7-inch lengths. Like hiking pants, we recommend trying on a number of shorts before you buy, but to assist online shoppers, we make sure to call out sizing and fit discrepancies in the write-ups above.
Sustainability
We appreciate when companies go the extra mile toward creating more sustainably built products, and the most common practice in the hiking short world is the use of recycled fabrics. Many of the picks above are made with at least some recycled content, including designs like Patagonia's Quandary Shorts, which use 96% recycled nylon from fishing nets. Other measures to look out for include certification to the Fair Trade standard and bluesign-approved materials, the latter of which indicates they’re safe for the environment, workers, and consumers. Finally, some shorts—including Patagonia’s Baggies collection—use PFC-free DWR coatings that forgo the use of harmful perfluorocarbons. Other brands at the forefront of the sustainability movement include REI Co-op, Outdoor Research, and Prana, although most of the companies above have started incorporating at least some of these practices into production.
Hiking Shorts vs. Hiking Pants
If you're hitting the trail in mild to hot conditions, you'll be faced with the decision of whether to wear a pair of hiking pants or shorts. There are a number of benefits to both: With pants, you get significantly more protection (from the sun, sharp objects, and bugs), and if temperatures drop or the wind picks up, your legs will be insulated against the elements. Pants generally offer more storage as well, don't bunch up when worn underneath a harness, and can guard against debris getting into your hiking shoes or boots. In short, they're the more high-performance design, and generally our choice for variable days, mountain environments, or when we want maximum protection.
On the other hand, shorts are by far the more ventilated choice, and their more minimalist design dries out quickly after getting wet. We generally prefer them on hot days or when we know we'll be playing in or around water (or needing to ford deep rivers). They're also the best option if you're mixing in a little running with your hiking: With less fabric overall, shorts won't weigh you down as much as pants, and you won't have to deal with the legs brushing up against each other with each stride. Oftentimes, we'll bring shorts for the hiking portion of our day, but pack a pair of pants for our destination, whether it's a climbing route, a campsite, or an exposed mountaintop. For the most versatile option, convertible pants (like the REI Co-op Sahara Convertible Pants) zip off at the knee and convert to shorts, but the design is polarizing and certainly not for everyone.
Back to Our Women's Hiking Shorts Picks Back to Our Women's Hiking Shorts Comparison Table