Best Hardshell Jackets of 2024

Hardshell jackets are designed for the mountains: They're highly windproof, waterproof, breathable, and durable. This is the outer layer you turn to for ultimate protection while backcountry and resort skiing, mountaineering, alpine climbing, and 4-season trekking. We've tested these stalwarts all over the world, from notoriously windy southern Patagonia to the consistently wet Pacific Northwest. Below we break down our 14 favorites for 2024, from minimalist models for those who want to move fast and light to burly jackets made to withstand harsh conditions. For more information, see our comparison table and buying advice below the picks, along with details about our testing process. For lighter-weight and more compressible jackets for everyday use and hiking, check out our article on the best rain jackets.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on November 1, 2024, to replace the Arc'teryx Beta LT with the Beta SL, add Patagonia's M10 Storm Jacket, remove a few outgoing shells from Outdoor Research, and incorporate fresh photos from a recent testing trip in Wyoming's Wind River Range.
 

Our Team's Hardshell Jacket Picks

• Best Overall Hardshell Jacket: Arc’teryx Beta AR
• Best Budget Hardshell Jacket: Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0
• Best Performance Hardshell for Extreme Conditions: Arc’teryx Alpha SV
• Best Ultralight and Packable Hardshell: Patagonia M10 Storm Jacket

Best Overall Hardshell Jacket

1. Arc’teryx Beta AR ($600)

Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 0.3 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex Pro
Denier: 40D & 80D
What we like: Excels in just about every category.
What we don’t: Expensive and not ideal for fast-and-light trips.

Hands down, Arc'teryx makes our favorite hardshell jackets. You pay a premium over the competition, but nothing else on the market matches the combination of performance, fit, and craftsmanship. Among the many options in their extensive lineup, the Beta AR is the quintessential do-all hardshell. The proven design is plenty tough to withstand brutal alpine conditions without compromising on comfort and breathability for everything from ski hut trips to backpacking. Arc'teryx honed things even further last year with improved durability and a Recco reflector for avalanche scenarios. This year, they also updated the hood and collar to improve overall fit. 

The Beta AR’s top-end Gore-Tex Pro fabric offers a high level of performance, but it’s the detailing that sets the jacket apart. The shell is properly outfitted for mountain use with a tall collar, fantastic hood with easy adjustability, and just-right fit for layering and mobility. And it’s downright comfortable for a hardshell with lightweight 40-denier fabric on the body. The 80-denier Gore-Tex on the shoulders may add weight, but it’s built to handle backpack straps and rain or snowfall. It’s true that the Alpha SV below is tougher and has a slimmer and longer cut, and you can save weight by choosing one of the thinner options below, but for all-around backcountry use, the Beta AR is best in class. Note: Arc'teryx also makes the Beta AR StormHood, which features a streamlined hood design that reduces the weight to 14.9 ounces... Read in-depth Beta AR review
See the Men's Arc'teryx Beta AR  See the Women's Arc'teryx Beta AR
 

Best Budget Hardshell Jacket

2. Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0 ($310)

Category: All-around/minimalist
Weight: 14.9 oz.
Waterproofing: Proflex
Denier: 20D
What we like: Softshell-like stretch and breathability for just $310.
What we don’t: Weather protection can’t match that of a dedicated hardshell; no pit zips.

Most hardshells start their bidding around $400, so Rab's Kinetic Alpine 2.0 is a really nice option to have on your radar. This hybrid jacket marries all of the features we look for in a hardshell—including a waterproof membrane, full seam taping, and a helmet-compatible hood—with the stretchy knit face fabric of a softshell (Rab calls it a “soft hardshell”). The net result is fantastic comfort, mobility, and breathability for hiking and climbing, alongside decent protection from wind and rain. For just $310, that’s a lot of performance packed into one jacket, and the trim fit and simple feature set keep weight low at 14.9 ounces.

Like many hybrid soft/hardshell pieces, one of the primary compromises with the Rab is outright weather protection. In general, you can expect the face fabric to wet out sooner than a standard hardshell, making it less reliable in sustained and heavy downpours. But the Kinetic Alpine 2.0 is a top performer in heavy winds and will afford you better moisture protection than standard wind jackets and softshells. We do wish Rab had added pit zips to the design, and the trim fit makes it difficult to layer anything more than a light jacket or baselayer underneath. But for all-day comfort with a respectable dose of weather protection, the Kinetic Alpine 2.0 will be a useful addition to many quivers—without breaking the bank... Read in-depth review (womem's version)
See the Men's Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0  See the Women's Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0
 

Best Performance Hardshell for Extreme Conditions

3. Arc’teryx Alpha SV ($900)

Category: Alpine
Weight: 1 lb. 1.1 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex Pro
Denier: 100D
What we like: Bombproof shell with fantastic detail work.
What we don’t: Very expensive.

For the toughest alpine conditions—think piercing wind, driving rain, sleet, and snow—you won't find a tougher shell than the Arc'teryx Alpha SV. This jacket sits at the very top of the Arc'teryx lineup in terms of both weather resistance (the SV means "severe weather") and price, and its performance while ski touring and mountaineering does not disappoint. Arc'teryx updated the jacket last year with Gore's latest "Most Rugged" Pro construction and a Recco reflector with only a minimal increase in weight. Given the strong 100-denier build (the most substantial on our list), it's impressive that the Alpha SV is less than an ounce heavier than the Beta AR above and only slightly less packable. It's also not lacking in features: You get pit zips, plenty of interior and exterior pockets, and trustworthy zippers.

There is literally nothing negative we can say about the Alpha SV's weather protection or durability, but it's realistically overkill for a lot of folks. The $900 price tag is eye-wateringly steep, and for the average backcountry explorer, the Alpha SV's tank-like construction is more than you'll ever need. Moreover, you do lose out on hand pockets with the alpine-focused design. In the end, you can certainly save money and weight with an alternative like the Beta AR above, but if you're looking for an iconic mountain hardshell that can handle some of the world's worst weather, this is it... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Arc'teryx Alpha SV  See the Women's Arc'teryx Alpha SV
 

Best Ultralight and Packable Hardshell

4. Patagonia M10 Storm Jacket ($379)

Category: Minimalist
Weight: 10.9 oz.
Waterproofing: H2No Performance Standard
Denier: 30D
What we like: Alpine-centric build and 3-layer protection in a minimalist package.
What we don’t: No hand pockets or pit zips.

It's nice to have the all-out security of a jacket like the Alpha SV or Beta AR above, but for weight-conscious missions like backpacking and alpine climbing, you can get away with a lot less. Patagonia's M10 Storm Jacket—the successor to the beloved Storm10—is a minimalist hardshell at its finest, packing 3-layer waterproof and breathable protection into a 10.9-ounce design that stuffs down into its chest pocket. Further, Patagonia didn't totally eschew creature comforts: You get a supple knit backer for next-to-skin comfort, three drawcords for dialing in the fit of the hood, two large chest pockets that are easy to access underneath a backpack hipbelt or climbing harness, and hook-and-loop cuffs with a grippy lining to keep them in place when reaching overhead. For fast-and-light or multi-day objectives when space is at a premium, it simply doesn't get much better.

Of course, there are some compromises to opting for such a streamlined jacket. While Patagonia opted for a thicker (30D) shell fabric than we’re used to seeing on ultralight pieces, the M10 Storm forgoes hand pockets entirely and omits pit zips for dumping excess heat. Further, the jacket fits on the trimmer end, although we found it to be a nice match for the intended use: The M10 is streamlined enough to stay out of the way on technical objectives but not so tight that it’s uncomfortable to wear while performing camp chores or relaxing after a long day out. Overall, we think Patagonia did a great job with the revamp, making the M10 Storm an excellent option for those looking for reliable technical performance in a feathery package. For an even lighter-weight option from Patagonia, their running-focused Storm Racer checks in at a scant 7.2 ounces but is even more compromised in terms of features... Read in-depth M10 Storm review (women’s version)
See the Men's Patagonia M10 Storm  See the Women's Patagonia M10 Storm
 

Best of the Rest

5. Norrøna Trollveggen Gore-Tex Pro Light ($649)

Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 1.3 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex Pro
Denier: 40D & 70D x 160D
What we like: Top-notch weather protection and build quality in a light and compressible design.
What we don’t: No hand pockets and especially long cut.

Norrøna may not be on everyone’s radar, but the Norway-based outdoor company has a serious lineup of quality hardshells. From their flagship Trollveggen series is the Gore-Tex Pro Light, which goes head-to-head with top-end designs like the Arc’teryx Beta AR above. This Gore-Tex Pro shell is meant for high-alpine adventure with a long cut, 40-denier face fabric with burly 70- by 160-denier reinforcements, a helmet-compatible hood, and a tall collar. But Norrøna kept weight intentionally low with the “Light,” which gives it versatility for weight-conscious activities like hiking and backpacking. And with large pit zips and a two-way main zipper, you can customize airflow for all manner of activities and conditions.

Where does the Trollveggen Light come up short? In our opinion, Norrøna took the alpine-focused build one step too far when they designed the jacket without hand pockets—instead, you get just two external chest pockets and one internal zippered stash. What’s more, the jacket features a very long cut, which is great for coverage but slightly polarizing for casual use. In contrast, the Beta AR has a more standard length and convenient hand pockets, which are situated high enough to access under a hipbelt or harness. Both are exceptionally built and highly protective shells, but the Beta AR’s more versatile design might be the deciding factor for many. Finally, the Trollveggen’s sizing runs a little small, and we wound up going up a size... Read in-depth review
See the Norrøna Trollveggen GTX Pro Light  See the Women's Norrøna Trollvegen GTX Pro Light

6. Patagonia Triolet ($449)

Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 2.0 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex ePE
Denier: 75D
What we like: A solid and trustworthy Gore-Tex shell at a reasonable price. 
What we don’t: Fairly heavy; fits and feels a little too much like a ski jacket.

It's easy to get excited about all the fun tech working its way into the hardshell world, but there's something to be said for a simple 3-layer Gore-Tex jacket. Patagonia's Triolet is just that, and it offers a lot in its no-nonsense package. The jacket's 75-denier face fabric and proven Gore-Tex build (recently upgraded to their more sustainable ePE mebrane) are plenty burly for alpine use, four exterior zippered pockets (plus a drop-in interior pocket) offer great organization, and two-way pit zips dump heat in a hurry. Plus, the Triolet excels as a ski jacket thanks to its extended cut and regular fit that easily accommodates a midlayer underneath, embedded Recco reflector, and glove-friendly adjustments. All in all, that's a lot of features and versatility for $449.

As we touched on above, the Triolet now features Gore's PFAS-free membrane, which is both lighter and thinner than their standard ePTFE membrane. This means that the jacket requires fewer materials—thus, fewer pollutants—to produce, resulting in a 1.4-ounce drop in weight. Despite the change, the jacket still comes up short for high-output activities or fast-and-light missions: The thick shell can’t match the breathability of thinner alternatives or more advanced waterproof membranes (like Gore-Tex Pro), and its 1-pound-2-ounce weight can be a burden to carry for extended stretches. Further, the Triolet’s substantial build and regular cut have a negative impact on mobility (it feels more like a ski jacket than alternatives like the Beta AR above). But despite its shortcomings, the Triolet’s trustworthy design makes it a go-to hardshell option for a wide range of winter sports at a good price... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Patagonia Triolet  See the Women's Patagonia Triolet

7. Arc’teryx Beta SL ($500)

Category: All-around/minimalist
Weight: 12.0 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex ePE
Denier: 40D x 70D
What we like: A streamlined version of the Beta AR above for $100 less.
What we don’t: Less winter-ready than the AR.

British Columbia-based Arc’teryx knows a thing or two about harsh mountain environments, and their Beta collection is well equipped to handle rough and rowdy weather. The latest addition to the line is the Beta SL, which we recently brought on a three-day backpacking trip in Wyoming’s Wind River Range. Despite frequent downpours, the Beta SL kept our tester dry and cozy thanks to its proven Gore-Tex membrane and nice array of protective features, including an adjustable hood that boasts excellent coverage, Velcro cuffs that extend past the wrists, dual hem drawcords, and pit zips for dumping excess heat. Arc’teryx also tacked on Gore’s C-Knit backer, which adds a nice dose of next-to-skin comfort and helps avoid the crinkly and stiff feel common among traditional hardshells. And at just 12 ounces, the Beta SL manages to pack it all in for a considerable 4 to 5 ounces less than the Beta AR and Alpha SV above.

What’s not to like with the Beta SL? Apart from the $500 price tag, which is actually on the cheaper end for a 3-layer shell from Arc’teryx, the jacket is a little low on storage with just three zippered pockets. Additionally, while the “fitted” cut is great for performance use, those who are in between sizes or prefer to layer heavily underneath should consider sizing up. And there are other signs of shaving weight: The cuff adjustments are fairly thin, there’s no two-way main zipper to prevent bunching, and the 40- by 70-denier shell fabric—while trustworthy—lacks the truly bombproof feel of thicker alternatives like the Beta AR and Alpha SV above (it's less ski-ready than both of those options). But overall, we feel the Beta SL balances its priorities well, and the fact that it undercuts the AR by $100 is certainly a selling point... Read in-depth review (women's version)
See the Men's Arc'teryx Beta SL  See the Women's Arc'teryx Beta SL

8. Himali Monsoon ($440)

Category: All-around
Weight: 15.4 oz.
Waterproofing: Toray
Denier: 50D
What we like: Premium all-around performance for less than the competition.
What we don’t: We had a couple small fit and finish issues during testing; not as widely available as many competitors.

Colorado-based Himali specializes in premium mountaineering apparel built to weather the world’s harshest weather—their logo pays homage to the 14 8,000-meter peaks in the Himalaya. We took their all-rounder Monsoon hardshell to Chilean Patagonia for testing in early 2024 and came away with seriously high praise. The first thing that stood out was attention to detail: Everything from the supple shell to the smooth-operating zippers has a decidedly high-quality feel, and Himali didn’t skimp on thoughtful touches like soft fleece along the collar and wrists. Tack on technical must-haves like hipbelt-friendly pockets, a two-way main zipper, a helmet-compatible hood, and a reasonably thick (50D) and confidence-inspiring exterior, and the Monsoon handily competes with options from competitors like Arc’teryx and Norrøna—at a more palatable price point to boot.

It's worth noting that Himali recently upped the price of the Monsoon from $365 to $440, making it less of a standout value (although it's still cheaper than all Arc'teryx alternatives here). Further, in testing the women’s model, we found the sleeves to be awkwardly short on our 5’6” tester, although the rest of the fit was spot-on: roomy enough to accommodate layering underneath but not overly bulky by any means. While certainly not a dealbreaker, the Himali’s pit zips only operate in one direction (for comparison, the Beta AR’s zippers are two-way), which makes it a little harder to tweak ventilation while on the move. Finally, the Monsoon isn’t as widely available as many competitors—a few retailers carry Himali gear, but chances are you won’t get to try the jacket on before you buy. If your main priority is maximizing performance for the price, however, the Monsoon should be on your short list.
See the Men's Himali Monsoon  See the Women's Himali Monsoon

9. Norrøna Falketind Gore-Tex Jacket ($549)

Category: All-around/minimalist
Weight: 12.6 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex ePE
Denier: 40D
What we like: A boost in coverage and comfort compared to the Arc’teryx Beta SL.
What we don’t: Pricey and lacks the crossover appeal of Arc’teryx shells.

Jackets in Norrøna’s Trollveggen collection offer the best in weather protection for demanding alpine objectives, while their Falketind lineup tones it down a bit with lightweight yet durable designs for all-around use. The Falketind Gore-Tex Jacket here is a quality technical shell, featuring a 30-denier face fabric with standard Gore-Tex waterproofing and a soft C-Knit liner. Pit zips help you dump heat during high-output endeavors, and the hand pockets are accessible while wearing a backpack or harness. It’s less of a stalwart defense against the elements compared to the Trollveggen above, but the Falketind offers lightweight 4-season performance for everything from hiking and backpacking to backcountry skiing.

Norrøna often gives Arc’teryx a run for its money in the jacket space, and the Falketind is an intriguing alternative to the Beta SL above. Like the Beta SL, the Falketind is competitively light at 12.6 ounces and features a relatively thin (40D) but still reliable face fabric that nicely balances weight and durability. In parsing out the differences, the Falketind has a longer hem and a taller and more protective collar (similar to that of the AR), which arguably makes it a better pick for skiing. On the flip side, the Norrøna’s hand pockets are positioned higher for access under a hipbelt or harness, but they aren’t a natural height for everyday use. In other words, the Falketind is decidedly more technical, and it will run you an additional $50 over the Beta SL. But there’s no denying the quality and all-around performance, and the fact that it crosses over better for winter use is certainly a plus.
See the Men's Norrøna Falketind GTX  See the Women's Norrøna Falketind GTX

10. Rab Kangri GTX ($425)

Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 2.5 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex
Denier: 70D
What we like: A well-priced and versatile Gore-Tex hardshell for backcountry use.
What we don’t: Main zipper is not water-resistant; length is a bit overkill for backpacking and hiking.

U.K.-based Rab is no stranger to variable alpine conditions, offering a full lineup of hardshells for everything from winter mountaineering to fast-and-light missions. And good news for value seekers: Their outerwear is often priced for considerably less than the competition without any real drop in quality. The popular Kangri GTX is no exception: For just $425, it’s fully prepared for bad weather, with a Gore-Tex membrane and burly, 70-denier recycled-nylon shell. You also get a full suite of features that hold little back, including a two-way center front zip, glove-friendly zipper pulls, large harness-compatible hand pockets, and two-way pit zips. We appreciated the Kangri’s protection while backpacking in Patagonia’s always-inclement weather, but it’s also a well-rounded choice for backcountry skiing, mountaineering, winter alpinism, and even around-town use.

The Kangri is far from minimalist, and Rab shows a clear prioritization of price over weight with the choice of an internal storm flap behind the front zip rather than a water-resistant zipper. What's more, the generous coverage struck us as a bit overkill for hiking and backpacking—it actually impacted mobility when bending over to tie boots, filter water, etc. But compared to other jackets with similar construction (like the Patagonia Triolet above and Helly Hansen Odin 9 Worlds below), the Kangri does feel a lot less like a ski jacket and checks in for about an ounce less, too. In the end, we think it's best suited for backcountry activities in the cold, whether you're a casual snowshoer or a serious peak-bagger. 
See the Men's Rab Kangri GTX  See the Women's Rab Kangri GTX

11. Fjallraven Keb Eco-Shell ($500)

Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 2.3 oz.
Waterproofing: Eco-Shell
What we like: Sophisticated performance; great comfort and style with a soft and stretchy shell.
What we don’t: Too heavy for backcountry use; side vents are strange.

Known for stylish yet high-performance products that bridge the gap between the mountains and the city, Swedish-based Fjallraven nailed the formula with their Keb Eco-Shell hardshell. This jacket is ready for the elements, with a stretchy, hardwearing polyester and Fjallraven's in-house Eco-Shell membrane. Water-resistant zips, sleek Velcro cuffs, and a helmet-compatible hood further help to batten down the hatches, and side vents open wide when heat starts to build. Of course, the Keb doesn't come up short on style points, either, with an array of non-traditional colorways (we loved the Chestnut), attractive chest pockets and pulls, and a classy Fjallraven patch on the left arm. And in contrast to the crinkly, rigid nature of many hardshells, it features a soft and stretchy face fabric, which lends a lot of comfort and versatility for casual environments. 

The Keb Eco-Shell was our go-to jacket last winter, ideal for everything from snowy walks to the office to powder days at the resort. However, for weight-conscious activities like backcountry skiing or backpacking, it's heavy at 1 pound 2.3 ounces and not particularly packable—we generally take along a lighter jacket like the Arc'teryx Beta SL instead. Further, the side vents aren't a win for us: Their low placement makes you much more vulnerable to the elements (it's for good reason that pit zips are hidden underneath your arms), and we constantly mistake them for pockets. In the end, $500 is a lot to spend on a casual hardshell, but for frontcountry activities and the odd day at the resort, the Keb offers great weather protection and is one of the best-looking designs here... Read in-depth review (women's version)
See the Men's Fjallraven Keb Eco-Shell  See the Women's Fjallraven Keb Eco-Shell

12. Mammut Taiss HS Hooded ($385)

Category: All-around/minimalist
Weight: 14.8 oz.
Waterproofing: Mammut Dry Expedition
Denier: 30D x 30D
What we like: An affordable and lightweight hardshell from a trusted brand.
What we don’t: In-house membrane may not be as reliable as Gore-Tex.

Not many outdoor brands have been in the business for as long as Mammut, which got its start making climbing ropes back in 1862. Over a century and a half later, the Swiss company is still committed to creating durable outerwear and gear for serious mountain adventures. We've long been a fan of their climbing ropes, harnesses, and ski backpacks but have only recently started to see Mammut apparel hit the shelves this side of the Atlantic with regularity (they're one of the biggest brands in Europe). Their Taiss HS got our attention last year: With a versatile all-rounder design and one of the lowest price tags here ($385), it's well deserving of a closer look.

The Taiss goes head-to-head with a design like the Norrøna Falketind GTX above. Both jackets are ideal pairings for fast-and-light travel or springtime conditions, with lightweight builds (the Mammut is 2.2 oz. heavier), relatively thin and supple shells (the Falketind is slightly beeifer), and pit zips. But while the Falketind features a premium Gore-Tex membrane with a soft liner, the Taiss cuts costs with an in-house waterproof membrane (which we have yet to test). It's certainly a less premium option, but Mammut has a strong track record for quality, and you simply won't find Gore-Tex at this price point.
See the Men's Mammut Taiss HS  See the Women's Mammut Taiss HS

13. Helly Hansen Odin 9 Worlds 3.0 ($450)

Category: All-around
Weight: 1 lb. 4.1 oz.
Waterproofing: Helly Tech Professional
Denier: 70D
What we like: Sustainably built; long front pockets offer a lot of storage.
What we don’t: Too heavy and thick for most backpackers; trim fit isn’t ideal for layering.

Helly Hansen might not have the flashy branding of names like Patagonia and Arc'teryx, but the Norwegian company is an outerwear stalwart. Their best-selling hardshell is the Odin 9 Worlds 3.0, which features a clean silhouette and keeps prices relatively low by way of an in-house Helly Tech Professional waterproof breathable membrane. A robust, 70-denier face fabric serves as a great defense against wind and rain, and underarm vents keep air circulating during high-output activities. You also get large front pockets that extend almost from the armpit to the waist, and they use two-way zippers so you can access one end without opening the entire length (particularly helpful when wearing a backpack or harness).

However, at 1 pound 4.1 ounces, the Odin stands out as the heaviest jacket here is and far too thick for summer backpacking or fast-and-light adventures (it's even a significant 4.9 oz. heavier than the Alpha SV above). But with thick 70-denier nylon and features like a Recco reflector, large front pockets, and a helmet-compatible hood, it's a great choice for backcountry skiing or other winter endeavors, particularly if you prefer a burly, durable jacket. Keep in mind that the Helly Hansen does run on the trim side, so those who wear a lot of layers might want to size up. Within this category, we rank the Patagonia Triolet higher thanks to its premium Gore-Tex membrane and lower price point. But the Odin is nevertheless a high-quality design for those in the market for a heavy-duty hardshell for 4-season use... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Helly Hansen Odin 9 Worlds 3.0  See the Women's HH Odin 9 Worlds 3.0

14. Mountain Equipment Lhotse ($750)

Category: Alpine
Weight: 1 lb. 1.6 oz.
Waterproofing: Gore-Tex Pro
Denier: 40D & 80D
What we like: Proven weather protection and great fit.
What we don’t: A bit heavy and bulky for an all-rounder.

U.K.-based Mountain Equipment isn’t a household name in the U.S., but it’s starting to gain traction. One of the reasons is they make a great product—their Lhotse jacket can stand up to just about anything in terms of weather protection and build quality. This shell is designed as an all-rounder for various uses like mountaineering, skiing, and winter trekking, and it features a familiar mix of 40- and 80-denier Gore-Tex Pro, a helmet-compatible hood with a tall collar, and pit zips. In addition, the Lhotse is known for having a great fit: It's cut long to accommodate a harness and offers plenty of space for layering without impacting mobility.

Despite its one-jacket-quiver intentions, the Lhotse is less of an all-rounder than our top picks. The durable sections of 80-denier fabric and three large zippered pockets add bulk and weight, and we think there are better values to be had (even Arc'teryx's premium Beta AR will save you $150). And a downside for those in the U.S. is availability: There aren’t nearly as many retailers selling Mountain Equipment as competitors like Arc’teryx, Outdoor Research, and Patagonia. But given the quality of their product, we’re hopeful that changes soon.
See the Men's Mountain Equipment Lhotse  See the Women's Mountain Equipment Manaslu

Hardshell Jacket Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

The Switchback Travel team spends a lot of time outside, and as a result, many of us have been caught outside countless times in ripping winds, pouring rain, and pelting sleet and snow. We first put this guide together back in 2017 with 15 picks. Many of those jackets are long gone, but others—most notably the Arc'teryx Beta AR and Alpha SV—are still in our lineup all these years later. For 2024, we have 14 jackets featured, all with something unique to offer depending on what you love to do in the great outdoors. Senior editor Chris Carter leads the charge on our lineup, researching and testing hardshell jackets as he explores mountaintops from the southern U.S. to Africa to Nepal. Other members of our team pitch in and love grabbing the right shell for everything from backpacking to backcountry skiing. 

A hardshell jacket is one of the most useful layers you can own—these water- and windproof pieces will protect you from the elements while also allowing you to layer underneath however the weather and your objective dictate. They're also typically more breathable than 2- and 2.5-layer rain jackets, so an essential part of our testing involves working up a sweat in serious weather. We also take a detailed look at weight, tailoring, features, and overall comfort. While not for everyone (a rain jacket or softshell could be the better choice depending on your intended use), for those pushing into high altitudes or deep snow, a hardshell will be an essential part of your kit.
 

Hardshell Jacket Buying Advice

• What Is a Hardshell Jacket?
• Hardshell Categories
• Waterproofing Technologies
• Durable Water-Repellent (DWR) Finish
• Fabric Thickness and Durability (Denier)
• Weight and Packed Size
• Fit
• Comfort: Rigid vs. Stretchy Hardshells
• Helmet-Compatible Hoods
• Pit Zips and Breathability
• Harness- and Backpack-Friendly Pockets
• Sustainability
• Hardshells vs. Rain Jackets and Softshells
   

What Is a Hardshell Jacket?

To be clear, there isn’t a perfect and universally accepted definition of a hardshell, but there are a number of common features that define this non-insulated jacket type. The most important is weather resistance: hardshell jackets offer high levels of waterproofing and windproofing for sustained exposure in harsh conditions. In addition, hardshells share a common 3-layer construction type that bonds an interior liner and exterior face fabric to a waterproof and breathable membrane. This differentiates them from rain jackets, which commonly use 2 or 2.5 layers as a way to cut costs and weight.
 

The combination of durability, weather protection, and breathability makes hardshell jackets popular for downhill and backcountry skiing, mountaineering, alpine and ice climbing, and 4-season hiking. The construction doesn’t come cheap: The most affordable jacket to make our list is the $310 Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0, and you can easily spend upwards of $800 (or more) on a quality shell. But these jackets are made to last and are the kind of apparel you rely on when Mother Nature gives you her worst.
 

Hardshell Categories: Alpine, All-Around, and Minimalist

All hardshells share a basic design and construction, but we’ve separated them into three general categories: alpine, all-around, and minimalist. Moving from alpine to minimalist, the jackets drop weight, features, and weather protection. Cost can vary—lightweight yet protective materials are often very pricey, meaning that many minimalist shells (like the $500 Arc’teryx Beta SL) will be more expensive than standard models. Most people will go with an all-around shell, but our alpine and minimalist categories fill in the gaps for those with more specific needs.

Alpine
Alpine shells are built for the extremes. Currently, both of the designs in our alpine category feature Gore-Tex's most premium "Pro" membrane, which is just about as protective as it gets. They're also built with heavy-duty fabrics (from 40D to 100D) and feature protective hoods for withstanding brutal high-mountain conditions. Finally, these shells are very specialized and very expensive as a result—the Mountain Equipment Lhotse costs $750, while Arc'eryx's Alpha SV is a whopping $900.
 

All-Around
If we were to pick a single shell for all backcountry outings, we would go with an all-around jacket. These designs have a wide range of uses, from hiking to ski mountaineering, and generally slide in between alpine and minimalist shells in terms of weight, fabric thickness, features, and cost. In addition, most of the all-around designs on our list feature a full array of pockets and a regular fit that's great for both mountain and around-town use (alpine and minimalist shells are often trim-fitting). The Arc'teryx Beta AR (featuring premium Gore-Tex Pro) has been our favorite all-around hardshell for years, but you can save a lot of money with a standard Gore-Tex model like the Patagonia Triolet.
 

Minimalist
At the lightweight end of the spectrum, minimalist hardshells are built with the goal of keeping weight and packed size to an absolute minimum. They are generally trim-fitting, feature thin shell fabrics, and have very few bells and whistles (often omitting pit zips and hand pockets). Minimalist shells are a great choice for shoulder-season activities like backpacking or climbing and also serve as a great emergency layer. However, with thin fabrics, they don't measure up to the rest of the hardshell competition in terms of durability and weather protection—we particularly don't recommend minimalist shells for true winter weather. Within this category, the Patagonia M10 Storm is the lightest on our list at 10.9 ounces, while designs like the Norrøna Falketind GTX (12.6 oz.) are a bit more well-rounded.
 

Waterproofing Technologies: Gore-Tex, AscentShell, H2No, and More

The quality and performance of a hardshell’s waterproof laminate is this jacket type’s defining feature. Gore-Tex still dominates the market—it’s no coincidence that you’ll see their name on most of the jackets that made our list. For top-of-the-line performance, Gore’s “Pro” laminate is the class leader. It balances high-mountain durability with waterproofing and breathability better than anything on the market, but does come with a significant increase in price. Gore’s standard shell isn’t as hardwearing as the “Pro,” but it can be used with much lighter fabrics, resulting in more minimalist pieces that are great for fast-and-light endeavors. 
 

We’ve found that Outdoor Research’s AscentShell, Patagonia's H2No Performance, and eVent are all formidable competitors to Gore-Tex. eVent was one of the first to really break through with their direct venting design, and these other technologies follow suit with air-permeable 3-layer builds to encourage airflow. Further, AscentShell (along with certain types of Patagonia's H2No) comes with the added bonus of a stretchy, softshell-like construction. Overall, while there aren’t as many options on the market that utilize these waterproofing designs, they are all worth considering if breathability is a priority.
 

Durable Water-Repellent (DWR) Finish

In addition to the 3-layer waterproof construction, another key piece of a hardshell’s protection and breathability is its durable water-repellent finish (commonly referred to as DWR). This coating is applied to the exterior of every jacket that made our list above to prevent moisture from absorbing into the face fabric by beading up the droplets. A fresh DWR is an impressive thing as it can offer sufficient protection and maximize a membrane’s ability to ventilate in light to moderate conditions. That said, heavy and sustained rain and snowfall will eventually overwhelm the coating, which is where the waterproof membrane and seam sealing comes into play. Over time, the DWR finish will wear down, although you can keep it fresh by washing and drying the shell or reapplying a new coating (Nikwax’s TX.Direct Wash-In is our personal favorite).
 

Fabric Thickness and Durability (Denier)

There are a number of factors that impact a jacket’s durability, but denier is a helpful indicator of strength. Denier is a measurement of fabric thickness, and the higher the number, the thicker the thread. Most all-around jackets for alpine climbing and skiing fall in the 30- to 80-denier range. Low-denier jackets usually weigh less and are slightly less durable, while high-number shells won’t pack down as small but can handle more abuse. Jackets that fall outside of the range above are more specialized: The 20-denier Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0 is best for lightweight hiking and backpacking, while the 100-denier Arc’teryx Alpha SV is absolutely bomber but comes with a very high price tag.
 

Weight and Packed Size

Depending on how a hardshell will be used, weight and packed size may or may not be a priority. In most cases, we’re willing to carry a little extra weight into the alpine for an added sense of security. As an example, there have been very few instances where we’ve regretted packing our 1-pound-1.1-ounce Alpha SV on a trip. On the other hand, for multi-day tours or if you’re traveling in mild conditions, it's best to leave a heavyweight like the 1-pound-4.1-ounce Helly Hansen Odin 9 Worlds 3.0 at home and instead bring a trimmed-down hardshell. The lightest and most compressible option from the list above is the Patagonia M10 Storm Jacket at a scant 10.9 ounces—its simplistic design and relatively thin materials make it as packable as a rain jacket, although you make concessions in features (there are no hand pockets or pit zips) and durability. An option that better balances weight, features, and toughness is Arc'teryx's 12-ounce Beta SL.
 

Fit

A jacket's fit often has a lot to tell you about its intentions. Most hardshells in our all-around category have a "regular" fit, allowing ample room for layering while providing great coverage and a stylish look that looks great on the mountain and in town. Oftentimes, minimalist and alpine jackets will be more trim-fitting, which saves weight and minimizes bulk but isn't as versatile for casual use. Within the hardshell landscape, Arc’teryx consistently has our favorite fit—the time and effort that’s gone into the design and tailoring of their shells is immediately apparent when you slip them on. They’re comfortable with or without a midlayer jacket and fit a lot of body types very well. This is a primary reason that many professional mountain guides and serious outdoorspeople are willing to spend up for Arc’teryx. But it’s not a one-horse race, and brands like Norrøna, Rab, and Mammut are similarly impressive.
 

Comfort: Rigid vs. Stretchy Hardshells

Some of the biggest complaints of hardshell jackets are their rigid feel and crinkly sound. And the criticisms are typically warranted—the tough face fabric (up to 100D) isn’t as flexible as thinner blends and can be pretty noisy for activities with a lot of movement like skinning, belaying, or hiking. Not only are they loud, but rigid hardshells can also impede movement, making them an onerous choice for high-mobility activities like alpine climbing and backcountry skiing. However, it’s a compromise many are willing to accept for the all-out weather protection that these robust shells provide.
 

That said, we've begun to see more and more stretchy hardshells hit the market, which address both issues mentioned above. Fjallraven's Keb Eco-Shell is a great example of this style, with a softshell-like face fabric alongside a thick, 3-layer construction typical of a hardshell. We've worn the Keb Eco-Shell while backpacking and skiing, and it's proven to be both quiet and highly mobile, even while reaching high overhead. Other stretch-infused jackets include the Rab Kinetic Alpine 2.0 (above), Patagonia Upstride, and Outdoor Research Skytour, the latter two of which are purpose-built for backcountry skiing.
 

Helmet-Compatible Hoods

A hood that can fit over your helmet is a pre-requisite for alpine use. When the wind is really blowing, throwing on a hood is your best form of protection. Almost all of the jackets on the list above include a hood that can fit over a climbing helmet. If you’ll be skiing with the jacket, you’ll need a hood that’s even larger to fit the bulkier shape of a ski helmet. Most manufacturers list the jackets only as being “helmet-compatible,” so we’ve called out hoods that run a little small in our write-ups above. Our favorite hoods consistently come from Arc’teryx: They're highly adjustable, easy to use, and don’t feel ungainly when you’re not wearing a helmet.
 

Pit Zips and Breathability

If you’ll prone to running hot or need a waterproof shell for high-output activities, we recommend choosing a jacket with pit zips. Even the best waterproof breathable membrane will make you overheat in mild temperatures on the skin track, and we value the ability to quickly dump heat. We also prefer pit zips to ventilated chest pockets, because the location under the arms is better protected from falling rain or snow. There are some cases where you may want to pass on the feature—such as for fast-and-light trips—but we’re usually quite willing to accept the extra ounces and slightly larger packed size.
 

Harness- and Backpack-Friendly Pockets

Most hardshell jackets have hand pockets placed midway up the torso to accommodate a backpack hipbelt or climbing harness. The high placement means you can open and close the pocket without needing to pull up on the jacket or unclip the belt. The end result is that the pockets are slightly less comfortable—the location isn’t as natural of a resting place for your hands—but it’s something we’re willing to tolerate to make the pockets usable. At the extreme end of the spectrum are designs like the alpine-focused Arc'teryx Alpha SV, which foregoes hand pockets altogether and instead boasts dual chest pockets. You lose a little storage and don’t have a place to put your hands going this route, but many weight-conscious backcountry adventurers are happy to make the trade.
 

Sustainability

In 2024, one of the primary ways we see manufacturers innovating is through the use of more sustainable materials. In terms of hardshells, this means recycled face fabrics, more responsible production practices (including the elimination of harmful chemicals from water-repellent finishes—aka PFAS-free DWR), and an emphasis on the ethical treatment of workers. Many companies also utilize the bluesign system for sourcing materials responsibly. Patagonia is a clear leader in the sustainability movement, but brands like Outdoor Research, REI, Arc’teryx, and Black Diamond have also made a sizable effort to reduce their footprint. And while we encourage you to shop sustainably, we’re also big advocates of lowering consumption by reusing old gear. Many brands offer repair programs and used marketplaces for their offerings, and gear consignment stores can be treasure troves for like-new items.
 

Hardshells vs. Rain Jackets and Softshells

There are three general options for an outer layer: rain jackets, softshells, and hardshells. As the name indicates, rain jackets provide good water and wind protection. Compared with a hardshell, rain jackets are less durable and won’t breathe as well, but are quite a bit cheaper (prices range from approximately $150 to $350), lighter-weight, and compress smaller for packing. We prefer rain jackets for daily wear, on summer backpacking trips, or as emergency shells when bad weather isn’t in the forecast. But if you’re headed to the alpine or are out in winter conditions, we turn to a hardshell.
 

As the names indicate, softshell and hardshell jackets are differentiated by the type and feel of their face fabrics. Softshell jackets are pliable, stretchy, and soft to the touch (especially on the interior), while hardshells are smooth and more rigid. In terms of weather resistance, it isn’t even close—even waterproof softshell jackets don’t offer nearly the same level of protection. Many softshells are only water- and wind-resistant instead of waterproof, instead focusing on breathability for working hard in mild conditions. We prefer a softshell in good conditions or on the climb up at lower elevations, but if weather really moves in, there’s no replacement for a quality hardshell.
Back to Our Top Hardshell Jacket Picks  Back to Our Hardshell Jacket Comparison Table